Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should treat all data on the internet equally.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 8.1k Trinity - Spadina voters.
13% Yes |
87% No |
11% Yes |
80% No |
1% Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website) |
5% No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
1% Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
2% No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
1% Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 8.1k Trinity - Spadina voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 8.1k Trinity - Spadina voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Trinity - Spadina voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZJS72H1wk1W
Yes, if the prices for consumers go down and they can only speed websites up and are not allowed to slow down websites
@9VT96JX1mo1MO
If the internet is slow then since what is most popular is what most people are trying to get to, then I think it’s fair to speed up a more used website at the expense of another
@9TNKQWJ2mos2MO
It would be good if the internet was faster for providers who pay more money, but not to slow down the internet for those who don't pay.
@9F5KMPV1yr1Y
It's really unfair if the bigger sites have a faster connection. There's too many monopolies online. The little guy shouldn't be at the disadvantage. A website should not be allowed to pay for optimal speed. Every site should have equal speed.
@93BR42H2yrs2Y
Private companies are free to do as they please
@93B6FPP2yrs2Y
Internet should be open and not controlled by only two overseers (bell and rogers)
@92C6BJV3yrs3Y
Regardless, not a governmental concern.
Join in on the most popular conversations.