+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 8.1k Trinity - Spadina voters.

13%
Yes
87%
No
11%
Yes
80%
No
1%
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
5%
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
1%
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
2%
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
1%
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 8.1k Trinity - Spadina voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 8.1k Trinity - Spadina voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Trinity - Spadina voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZJS72Hfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

Yes, if the prices for consumers go down and they can only speed websites up and are not allowed to slow down websites

 @9VT96JXfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

If the internet is slow then since what is most popular is what most people are trying to get to, then I think it’s fair to speed up a more used website at the expense of another

 @9TNKQWJfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

It would be good if the internet was faster for providers who pay more money, but not to slow down the internet for those who don't pay.

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

It's really unfair if the bigger sites have a faster connection. There's too many monopolies online. The little guy shouldn't be at the disadvantage. A website should not be allowed to pay for optimal speed. Every site should have equal speed.

 @93BR42Hfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @93B6FPPfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Internet should be open and not controlled by only two overseers (bell and rogers)