Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should treat all data on the internet equally.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 9.9k Conservatism voters.
20% Yes |
80% No |
18% Yes |
74% No |
1% Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
4% No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
1% Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users |
2% No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
1% Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website) |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 9.9k Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 9.9k Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZJS72H1mo1MO
Yes, if the prices for consumers go down and they can only speed websites up and are not allowed to slow down websites
@9VT96JX3mos3MO
If the internet is slow then since what is most popular is what most people are trying to get to, then I think it’s fair to speed up a more used website at the expense of another
@9TNKQWJ3mos3MO
It would be good if the internet was faster for providers who pay more money, but not to slow down the internet for those who don't pay.
@9F5KMPV1yr1Y
It's really unfair if the bigger sites have a faster connection. There's too many monopolies online. The little guy shouldn't be at the disadvantage. A website should not be allowed to pay for optimal speed. Every site should have equal speed.
@93BR42H3yrs3Y
Private companies are free to do as they please
@93B6FPP3yrs3Y
Internet should be open and not controlled by only two overseers (bell and rogers)
@92C6BJV3yrs3Y
Regardless, not a governmental concern.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
