The CSA Group (formerly the Canadian Standards Association), is a not-for-profit standards organization whose primary activities are producing technical standards that are intended to address the needs of a group of affected adopters. Among the fifty-seven different areas of specialization are climate change, business management and safety and performance standards, including those for electrical and electronic equipment, industrial equipment, boilers and pressure vessels, compressed gas handling appliances, environmental protection, and construction materials.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Response rates from 359 Fiscal Conservatism voters.
28% Yes |
72% No |
28% Yes |
67% No |
2% No, and decrease funding |
|
2% No, and eliminate funding |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 359 Fiscal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 359 Fiscal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Fiscal Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9W6MXFY1mo1MO
I don't understand what this is about but if it's for a good cause and it's environmentally friendly, then go ahead and fund.
@9DCFY8F1yr1Y
@9P8NRFM 5mos5MO
No, leave the funding at its current rate, unless there is an event of emergency where current funding is not enough to control the situation.
@9FCZK2L1yr1Y
No, it has shown to be unfair and biased. I would support replacing it.
@9F3YN581yr1Y
Yes, this is peoples safety were talking about. Certainly CSA approved PPE would be better than risk of injury or loss of life.
@9F2VYKP1yr1Y
Leave the funding on how it is.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
