Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 712 Nepean 118 voters.
22% Yes |
78% No |
16% Yes |
74% No |
6% Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
3% No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
1% No, it should be raised |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 712 Nepean 118 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 712 Nepean 118 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Nepean 118 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8KQL6XN4yrs4Y
There are some incredibly smart kids that know more than the average adult about worldly topics and politics. Perhaps, when younger aged, they can write a short and simple test to show their competence in order to vote.
@B25LX3V1wk1W
Yes, but have it that voters from 16-18 must pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics and must be taxpayers (like income or property)
@9ZDNVZN1mo1MO
16 should be the youngest age. If they start voting before leaving home, they may continue after they leave home. I so badly wanted to vote at age 16.
@9ZBHBNV2mos2MO
Yes, and there should be a maximum voting age after which voters get disenfranchised. If you have no stake in the future, your opinion does not matter.
@9YNCRS72mos2MO
No, there should be a test demonstrating their basic understanding of politics but if failed should only warn the individual they shouldn't vote but still let them
@9YCMSKN2mos2MO
No it should there should be a iq and eq test to make sure the individual is smart enough to vote. cause some people at 15 are more mature than a grown adult. i think it should be over 15 though.
@B24XS7D1wk1W
It matters less about age and if they actually understand party policies and how that will affect the country.
@9ZYD7ZL3wks3W
Old people shouldn’t be able to vote (80+) because they will die before they see the effects of their vote
Join in on the most popular conversations.
