@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcareStarted 9yrs agoActive 8hrs ago

Should the federal government increase spending on healthcare?

+
Expand
+ Settings x  

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.4k Etobicoke Centre voters.

80%
Yes
20%
No
74%
Yes
16%
No
6%
Yes, and do not privatize any services
3%
No, and implement a two tier public/private system
1%
No, and more services should be privatized

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Etobicoke Centre voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Etobicoke Centre voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Etobicoke Centre voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4R4XY7Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase with direction towards more natural medicine/treatment to promote safety and reason.

 @B2XHDKFfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Only in needed ways, and ways that would help the people in healthcare that work hard and long hours for their money, for the good of everyone.

 @9MFQG58from Saskatchewan  answered…11mos11MO

No healthcare should be free for everyone because people are really poor these days and can barely afford to live

 @B4BD553from Ontario  answered…5 days5D

The provincial governments need to use all the money they’re actually getting from the federal governments.

 @B4B6HTFfrom New Brunswick  answered…5 days5D

Invest in research and solutions on why so much health care is needed. Why are so many sick? What in our culture drives the increase of mental illness, physical illness and chronic illness.

 @B47FML7from Alberta  answered…1wk1W

No, and by eliminating the bloat of bureaucracy in health care we can save money. Use more private health providers with public money.

 @B45YBP6from Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Spend more on preventative and proactive healthcare, which will reduce reactive healthcare (the current system)

 @B45BC94from Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Yes, and implement some private systems to relive pressure on public system. As long as public system provides equal care as private system.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

CEOs Love Talking About Their Fast-Food Jobs

A stint in fast food is a badge of honor for business leaders who want to be viewed as humble and relatable—and proof that they worked to get where they areBut what does flipping burgers or rolling burritos have to do with running a company?A lot, say high-level managers who’ve done those jobs. Sweating in cramped kitchens and taking orders from hangry diners teach you how to handle pressure and deal with all kinds of people, executives say. Some are eager to find employees who hustled like they did, figuring someone who boxed McNuggets for minimum wage early on isn’t likely to be a quiet quitter.“Any job where you’re on the lowest tier is a really good job to have done in your life because it shows your character,” says Heather McLean, who worked at McDonald’s in high school and is CEO of McLean Forrester, a technology consulting firm in Illinois. “I always took the attitude to bloom where you’re planted so, yeah, I was just taking orders at McDonald’s—but I was really good at it.”Being a model employee is easier when you’ve got bigger and better career prospects ahead. Executives who worked in fast food say they learned empathy and gratitude by toiling alongside colleagues who didn’t have other opportunities and were trying to make a living at or near minimum wage.Fast-food kitchens were long among the few places where future CEOs and low-wage lifers mingled and learned from one another. And because just about everyone orders a burger or pizza now and then, the customer base is a cross section of the American public.

▲  2512 replies1 disagree

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Trump Pivots: "Pease Deal With Iran Now!"

Trump proposes a "Verified Nuclear Peace Agreement" with Iran, expressing preference for diplomacy over military action and calling for immediate negotiations.Despite advocating for diplomacy, Trump simultaneously issued an executive order reinstating his "maximum pressure" sanctions policy from his first administration.The sanctions campaign aims to completely halt Iran's oil exports, particularly focusing on exports to China, which currently receives about 1.7 million barrels per day.Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded by calling the maximum pressure strategy a "failed experience" while indicating openness to discussions about their nuclear program.The executive order includes reviewing and potentially rescinding existing sanctions waivers, including those related to the Chabahar port project operated by India.Iranian oil exports had previously dropped from 3 million barrels per day in 2018 to 420,000 barrels per day in December 2019 under Trump's first-term sanctions.Iran currently maintains a "shadow fleet" of oil tankers operating outside Western banking and insurance services to circumvent US restrictions.Oil markets showed limited reaction to Trump's announcement, with Brent crude dropping 1% as traders doubt the ability to completely block Iranian exports.Analysts suggest Iran could become a negotiating tool in US-China trade discussions, with China potentially willing to reduce Iranian oil imports as it modernizes its refining sector.Iranian analysts indicate Tehran would likely reject any agreement attempting to restrict their ballistic missile program, which they consider their primary deterrent.

▲  1510 replies