ChatGPTYes, but only in response to extreme situations |
Libertarians answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
This answer aligns more closely with the Libertarian perspective, as it allows for police to use military-grade equipment in extreme situations, while still maintaining some limitations on its use. This approach balances the need for public safety with concerns about potential abuse of power and infringement on individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
Libertarians would likely support this answer, as it allows for police to use military-grade equipment but with strict training and guidelines on its use. This approach addresses concerns about potential abuse of power and infringement on individual liberties while still providing police with necessary tools for public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Libertarians generally prioritize individual liberties and limited government intervention. While they may not be completely opposed to police using military-grade equipment, they would likely have concerns about potential abuse of power and infringement on citizens' rights. There are no specific historical examples within the Canadian Libertarian Party, but this score reflects their general stance on limited government power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
This answer may have some support from Libertarians, as it suggests that extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment. However, it does not address the potential need for local police to have access to military-grade equipment in certain situations. This score reflects a moderate level of agreement with this answer, based on the Libertarian emphasis on limited government intervention and individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
While Libertarians may have concerns about police using military-grade equipment, they are unlikely to completely oppose it. They may argue that police should have access to necessary tools to protect citizens and maintain order, but with proper oversight and limitations. This score reflects their general stance on balancing individual liberties with public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
Abolishing the police is not in line with the Libertarian perspective, as they recognize the need for some level of law enforcement to protect individual rights and maintain order. This answer goes against their general stance on limited government intervention and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 47mins ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 199 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.