Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHAnswersCriminal Issues10yrs ago

No, and reinstate the death penalty for heinous premeditated crimes

Reply

 @B29K7YN from Ontario  agreed…4mos4MO

Why I think the death penalty should be used for heinous premeditated crimes is because for the person to pull off that crime they've probably been thinking about it for months premeditating something and then doing it is just cold-blooded and I think it can possibly deserve the death penalty.

 @9M257QZfrom Ontario  disagreed…12mos12MO

These people have commited horrible crimes, and they should get what they deserve, and be forced to feel the same pain.

 @9FMVKZBfrom Ontario  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The death penalty has been proven in both our country's past and some parts of the USA that the death penalty sometimes times convicts the wrong person and the government ending the life of a innocent individual.

 @9FKT43Xfrom Ontario  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The death penalty is a cruel act, if someone is mentally ill and has the ability to be helped instead of being slaughtered I would much rather that.

 @9FDFYNXConservativefrom British Columbia  agreed…2yrs2Y

if you were in the position of your daughter or son getting killed, would you want to see that person walking on the streets. I don't think so.

 @9GNFLKKfrom Ontario  disagreed…1yr1Y

I believe that a life sentence in prison is enough to make a person suffer for their crimes. Most times they suffer from a mental illness and I believe that killing out of "revenge" isn't ethically correct.

 @9G8FV7Vfrom Alberta  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Death is an extreme solution to any problem. It’s very often someone convicted of a crime worth the death penalty is mentally ill. And besides, rotting away in prison is a bigger punishment than death anyways.

 @9G2SW55from Ontario  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The death penalty has been proven in both our country's past and some parts of the USA that the death penalty sometimes times convicts the wrong person and the government ending the life of a innocent individual.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

FBI Director Chris Wray Will Resign

The F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, told bureau employees on Wednesday that he intended to resign before the Trump administration begins, bowing to the reality that President-elect Donald J. Trump had publicly declared his desire to replace him.Mr. Wray made the disclosure while addressing employees Wednesday afternoon in remarks that tacitly acknowledged the politically charged position the F.B.I. now faces with an incoming president who openly scorns the agency.“I’ve decided the right thing for the bureau is for me to serve until the end of the current administration in January and then step down,” Mr. Wray said, adding, “This is the best way to avoid dragging the bureau deeper into the fray, while reinforcing the values and principles that are so important to how we do our work.”The director spoke wistfully about his time at the F.B.I. “This is not easy for me,” he said. “I love this place, I love our mission and I love our people.”The announcement comes after Mr. Trump said in late November that he intended to nominate Kash Patel, a longtime loyalist, to run the F.B.I., and more than two years before Mr. Wray’s 10-year term would have expired.Paul Abbate, the deputy F.B.I. director, is set to retire in April but would typically serve as acting director until Mr. Patel is confirmed. It is not clear who would replace Mr. Abbate, the most senior agent in the bureau.Over more than seven years, Mr. Wray oversaw one of the most consequential and tumultuous periods in the bureau’s history, juggling high-profile criminal investigations of political figures, heated congressional inquiries and two attempted assassinations of Mr. Trump.

▲  177 replies

Active 1wk ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1127 replies