Try the political quiz
 @ISIDEWITHNewsCanadaFederal Governmentasylum seekersResettlement PlanProvincial Opposition•••8mos ago

Canadian Provinces Resist Federal Asylum Seeker Resettlement Plan

Several Canadian provinces are pushing back against the federal government's plan to resettle asylum seekers across the country. New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith have both expressed opposition, with Higgs revealing a plan to send 4,600 asylum seekers to New Brunswick without additional funding, and Smith citing cost and 'shared values' as reasons for Alberta's refusal. In British Columbia, Conservative Party Leader John Rustad accused the Trudeau government of 'dumping' 22,000 asylum seekers on the province. This resistance comes amid broader concerns from provincial leaders about the financial and social implications of the federal resettlement strategy, highlighting a significant discord between provincial and federal approaches to asylum seeker resettlement.

8 Replies

 @CowMaxNational Conservatismfrom Ontario  commented…8mos8MO

It's refreshing to see provinces standing up to the federal government's irresponsible plan to scatter asylum seekers across the country without proper support or consideration for the communities they're being sent to. The lack of coordination and funding shows a disregard for both the asylum seekers' well-being and the capacity of provinces to integrate them effectively.

 @6GFWM7YRight-Wing Populismfrom Ontario  commented…8mos8MO

Can't say I'm surprised to see some pushback on this. It feels like Trudeau's government is trying to force provinces into a corner without considering the real-world implications, especially in terms of costs and whether these communities can actually support such a sudden influx of people. Higgs and Smith are right to question the lack of additional funding and the whole 'shared values' issue Alberta's worried about. It's about time someone stood up and questioned whether this federal plan is really in the best interest of the provinces or just another top-down decision ignoring local realities.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

If your hometown was chosen to resettle a large number of asylum seekers, what would be your primary concern and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

What are your thoughts on the balance between humanitarian aid and maintaining local resources when accepting asylum seekers?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…8mos8MO

How do you feel about using government funds to support the resettlement of asylum seekers in your local community?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…8mos8MO

Rustad claims Trudeau 'dumping' 22,000 asylum seekers on BC

https://kamloopsbcnow.com

Conservative Party of BC Leader John Rustad has claimed the Trudeau government is “dumping” 22,000 asylum seekers on the

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…8mos8MO

'Not open': Smith cites cost and 'shared values' in pushback against Ottawa's asylum seeker relocation plan

https://edmontonjournal.com

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her province “is not open” to accepting more relocated asylum seekers, citing “shared values” and cost, something the federal government says it’s open to providing.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…8mos8MO

Provinces decry Ottawa’s plan to resettle asylum seekers across the country

https://thestar.com

New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs claimed last week that the federal government wants to force the province to take in 4,600 asylum seekers.

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

FBI Director Chris Wray Will Resign

The F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, told bureau employees on Wednesday that he intended to resign before the Trump administration begins, bowing to the reality that President-elect Donald J. Trump had publicly declared his desire to replace him.Mr. Wray made the disclosure while addressing employees Wednesday afternoon in remarks that tacitly acknowledged the politically charged position the F.B.I. now faces with an incoming president who openly scorns the agency.“I’ve decided the right thing for the bureau is for me to serve until the end of the current administration in January and then step down,” Mr. Wray said, adding, “This is the best way to avoid dragging the bureau deeper into the fray, while reinforcing the values and principles that are so important to how we do our work.”The director spoke wistfully about his time at the F.B.I. “This is not easy for me,” he said. “I love this place, I love our mission and I love our people.”The announcement comes after Mr. Trump said in late November that he intended to nominate Kash Patel, a longtime loyalist, to run the F.B.I., and more than two years before Mr. Wray’s 10-year term would have expired.Paul Abbate, the deputy F.B.I. director, is set to retire in April but would typically serve as acting director until Mr. Patel is confirmed. It is not clear who would replace Mr. Abbate, the most senior agent in the bureau.Over more than seven years, Mr. Wray oversaw one of the most consequential and tumultuous periods in the bureau’s history, juggling high-profile criminal investigations of political figures, heated congressional inquiries and two attempted assassinations of Mr. Trump.

▲  177 replies

Active 2wks ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1127 replies