Do you think increasing funding for shelters will truly help, or will it lead to other challenges?

i believe we must fix a social core, in which homeless people cannot work and must become freelancers. we must allow the homeless to work, and currently the people most easily applicable are ones in shelter, with ability of proper hygiene, and presentability within these shelters.

lead to other challenges. People will think they can get everything for free and have more money to get high.

In my opinion, I think we should be working towards getting them off the street and getting over addictions and getting them to contribute to society then trying to hide them away and just putting them into a shelter.

It will lead to other challenges, as people will see it as a free way out, instead of trying themselves. Getting a new home and new job.

I think we should put Them all on a bus and ship them back to Vancouver

No, it will lead to many problems because it will cost taxpayers too much.

I believe that funding for the homeless would work if used properly, supplying them with safe spots to get high doesn't give them a job, a meal, etc. Funding for addiction prevention, shelter, and food could lead to an increase in homeless people turning their lives around.

No. Most of them are drug addicts nontheless, and it would cause problems for people who don't like each other.

I believe it could help with housing homeless people, and getting them on track in life.

In my opinion, the statistics support the fact that men make up the bulk of the actual homeless. Yet there are fewer and fewer men's shelters out there for them. We should be investing the bulk of our money and efforts where the statistics support the need, and not simply deferring to political pandering.

I do not believe it will help with homelessness, this will only make them more dependent.

i believe it will be a problem because it’s allowing them to not work towards their goals and improve on not being stuck in a shelter.