AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@B4DZYGV2wks2W
Ai only exists from current data already provided by humans, just presented in a sometimes convenient manner, but can also contain deadly flaws too frequently.
@B4DQHBR2wks2W
yes, but not for all, AI is still new and we should wait a couple more years for it to reach a higher potential, so for now we should just work for it.
@B3VDD9H1mo1MO
I think it's a good idea to save more lives in the military, but dangerous if the system gets hacked.
@B3RXXXK1mo1MO
While AI can enhance security, reduce risks, and modernize the military, it also poses ethical and security challenges. Investing in AI for defense (not just offense), with proper oversight and global cooperation, might be the best approach.
@9W6MXFY6mos6MO
No, at the end of the day AI can have false positives and needs to be constantly kept maintained by humans so might as well just use humans.
@9W45G3Y6mos6MO
it depends but overall we should be using this as people not for defensive purposes, ai should only be used for learning
@9VWVZQB6mos6MO
Yes, but should not be replacing any jobs. It should be a research tool opposed to a replacement to human input. It's not powerful enough yet in my eyes
@9VCJBMD7mos7MO
Yes, but only so we don't get far behind in military technology. And as long as it can be overridden easily.
@B2F3YBD3mos3MO
No. AI is bad for climate and should be used as little as possible, the future of AI should be in the hands of the public, for the public to decide.
@9YKVWYHNew Democratic5mos5MO
AI is difficult because its a new thing. It can be used for good and bad, so Its a case-by-case basis.
@9W9M54X6mos6MO
Yes but until AI becomes more advanced it should not be the biggest priority nor should we rely on it too heavily if it does reach that level of advancement.
@9VDRGX47mos7MO
no the government should work on developing the humans brain instead of creating (AI) for defense applications.
@9TKHGCV7mos7MO
Hoping we all watched Terminator, we need to implement immense security and strict control measures if we do invest in AI defense. So yes, we should invest in AI defense, but keep a strict fist clenched over it.
@9TJX5977mos7MO
Yes, provided it is under constant review by a third party government agency of bipartisans overseeing this.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
