Should the government prioritize the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges over building new infrastructure?

Yes, but only in regards to vital roads and traffic chokepoints

It depends, if a road or bridge is in desperate need of repair, then yes, but if the infrastructure is really important, then focus on it.

I think there exists a happy medium between the two. Canada should strive to make "walkable" cities that are as pedestrian friendly as possible, and to do so would require both repair and new infrastructure.

No, if the maintenance includes upgrading the infrastructure.

New infrastrasructure should always be the bigger priority in the economy we are in to encourage growth; however, constant maintenance of existing roads and such is still important and should be the bigger concern for the provincial government

Depends on the situation. Sometimes infrastructure needs to be replaced due to age and degradation regardless of maintenance, and such maintenance costs might outweigh the costs of building new.

Yes, but we do need new infrastructure especially in rural areas to keep critical infrastructure safe from forest fires.

This is where so see way too much wasted money by things like re paving roads that are perfectly fine and multiple workers standing around. Its infuriating!!!

Both things are important. New infrastructure should be prioritized except in cases where existing infrastructure has become dangerous when not maintained or repaired.

Both must be a priority but it is more important to keep all infrastructure in tact than to just build it new leaving the existing infrastructure in disrepair.