Algorithms used by tech companies, such as those that recommend content or filter information, are often proprietary and closely guarded secrets. Proponents argue that transparency would prevent abuses and ensure fair practices. Opponents argue that it would harm business confidentiality and competitive advantage.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@B46V7MRLibertarian3wks3W
Consumers should not use products that are not suitably transparent. I avoid any product that requires I use my real name or create a user account. I would prefer a cultural shift where the average person could not be persuaded to use a product with no algorithmic transparency.
@B2BXZ8J3mos3MO
Yes, but only if those algorithms are kept confidential between the tech company and the regulator(s)
@B47XK9D3wks3W
tech companies should not have access to any of your information nonetheless sell it to other companies
@B43SXTX 4wks4W
Support disclosure for high-impact algorithms (e.g., those affecting elections, hiring, healthcare, or financial services).
Push for independent audits rather than full government access—third-party groups could assess fairness and safety without exposing trade secrets.
Encourage transparency reports where companies explain how their algorithms work in general terms without giving away proprietary code.
Ensure user choice & control so people can opt out of certain algorithm-driven decisions or customize what they see.
@9SZHZL38mos8MO
Tech companies are allowed to share generalized algorithms with regulators but not individual/personal ones
@B387D5QNew Democratic2mos2MO
there should be some for of oversigth coity to makr sure then no wantom abuse of public or privet data farming for corpret greed and malicius use of ai
@B2TS86R2mos2MO
yes and no they can keep some secrets but they should try and make sure everyone is protected online and not just them
@B2SL7842mos2MO
if it is something that is revolutionary than sure, reveal but otherwise it is a tech secret of the company
@B2SKW422mos2MO
Yes, but only after board decision and with a committee making this decision under to insure that the power of this is not being corrupted
@B2RXD2Y2mos2MO
i think they should to an extent. the things that they do shouldnt be fully covered up by protection but then also its beneficial to have some work hidden from the public eye. it think it depends on what they are requesting them to share.
@B2MXWGH3mos3MO
Yes only if needed and it has to be confidential between the government and regulators and with the consent of the user.
@B2BHZSXConservative3mos3MO
No because some companies need an edge in their industry to produce higher-functioning technologies.
@B25MQFX4mos4MO
No, but they should have the authority to demand it if there is due reason presented and affirmed by a judge.
@9TT56PC7mos7MO
Yes free speech should be allowed to a certain point to not being discriminatory and mean however there should be protections on privacy settings.
@9RZPX678mos8MO
no that is an abuse of proprietary process/resources, but the extreme legal limit should be allowed and dis/misinformation be outlawed against it
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
