Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Political theme:
Province/Territory:
Electoral District (2011):
@9JWVKD81yr1Y
No, as nature can play a large part in someones well being and mindset. Also aspects of natural beauty like trees play a big part in climate change.
@9K3ML481yr1Y
As the world is changing we are often worried about the lives our children may not see because of the effects climate change is causing.
It will still be there. Climate change is a tax grab and a hoax by the current political government.
@9JF63CP1yr1Y
no i am not ease because I want my children to have nature around and play outside and feel nature around instead of being inside and on screens all day.
@9JFXCZT1yr1Y
life is possible only because of nature and its creatures. If one of life cycle disturbs, It affects food chains and finally harm species.
No, I think it would be a sad life without nature and I don’t know how the world would be able to function without the environment.
@9KD8SGV1yr1Y
Without nature, not only would we lose the natural beauty of our Earth, but we will further diminish our ability to survive.
I am not in favor of making more buildings and structures and eliminating nature. If I ever have children, I want them to enjoy the wonders of the world and this country. I want them to see the marvelous stuff about nature I once saw.
@9K5QKX81yr1Y
i wouldnt like that but i know that there will be enviomental beauty for my children to see because the govornment knows what they are doing when they cut trees down
@9JXFF3P1yr1Y
No. I would not be at ease. Knowing that my children in the future might not get to see a natural and healthy environment makes me wonder if they'll be getting good education.
@9K4M34N1yr1Y
Without actual proof of a healthy environment schools could phase out the education on a proper environment and further demonize how having a good environment made our economy worse or something stupid
@9JWVZ3L1yr1Y
the thought of the natural beauty I enjoy not being around for my children to see is deeply troubling and concerning. It's saddening to think that future generations might not have the opportunity to experience the awe-inspiring landscapes, diverse ecosystems, and rich biodiversity that our planet offers. The loss of natural beauty not only diminishes our collective heritage but also deprives future generations of the joy, inspiration, and connection to the natural world that I have been fortunate to experience. It underscores the urgency of taking meaningful action to address environmental challenges and protect our planet for the well-being of current and future generations.
@9K2B8L31yr1Y
nature is a fundamental aspect of a childs or any humans life. Why should one not get to experience its benefits, its joy, it's beauty? What did nature ever do to us that we should get rid of it completely??? Also nature was here before us, so how come we destroy it for our petty needs?
@9JPWY281yr1Y
no i think it is a stupid question to ask because only sick people would agree with such
@9JP8JY61yr1Y
No, it's insane to even think about it. In fact, we need to actively preserve and enjoy nature for the next generations.
@9JNSVKYConservative1yr1Y
no, due to how much effort we as a society have put in to making this a safe country
@9JLPBD31yr1Y
Well i cant say that i help the environment that much, but if everyone around me started going green, i would too, and we could have a beautiful green earth, but that is unlikely to happen
@9JHJXGR1yr1Y
I believe that we have a responsibility to live sustainably and preserve our home.
No, we need to preserve nature for all future generations
No, children should not be able to see and be around this!
@9K9STJ21yr1Y
The thought that future generations might not be able to enjoy the same natural beauties and wonders that we do now is disconcerting, but it also serves as a call to action. It draws attention to how urgently we must work together to solve environmental issues, advance sustainability, and protect the earth for next generations.
@9JGF6WP1yr1Y
Many individuals find the idea of losing natural beauty and environmental degradation deeply troubling, especially when considering the potential impact on future generations. If you are environmentally conscious, you might express concern about the consequences of anti-environmental practices and advocate for sustainable actions to ensure the preservation of natural landscapes for your children and future generations to enjoy.
It's common for people to feel a sense of responsibility to protect the environment, understanding that the choices made today can have lasting effects on the planet and the experiences available to those who come after us.
If natural being the outside I wouldnt be at ease knowing they wont be able to experience that
@9K5WY641yr1Y
Anti-environmentalism is like saying global warming doesn't exist.
No I wouldn't be at ease, Your children should see it and know the truth
@9JZRGP21yr1Y
No I wouldn't everyone should be able to experience the beauty of the world
@9JS5DLR1yr1Y
No, absolutely not. It's not just that they would get to see the natural beauty's of the world, the planet would also because increasingly difficult to live in, and what about their kids? We need to show responsibility for our actions and clean the planet up.
@9JR4C3N1yr1Y
meh if i have kids they better experience the 70s to 90s cars not the goofy electric ones
@9JQ2ZZ81yr1Y
I personally like the cities people have created so personally I would not mind if I never see a forest again. But I don't think it is fair to people who do like the environment.
@9JHCXP21yr1Y
It's a sad fate that younger generations might not be able to see the environment to the extent that we do.
@9JFXCZT1yr1Y
Considering the stance on "Anti-Environmentalism," it might be unsettling to think that the current natural beauty enjoyed might not persist for one's children. This highlights the significance of environmental stewardship to safeguard landscapes and ecosystems for the well-being of future generations.
@9LL92B412mos12MO
we need to stand up for our land bc its all we got we need for people to accept that if our land if gone how we gonna survive
@9LKHV3T12mos12MO
Yeah as long as we can live happy lives with total access to everything
@9LKHLWL12mos12MO
"Anti-Environmentalism" isn't a label that is commonly used by the right-wing. From my point of view, I can't help but notice that the notion of "eco-friendly" ideology is well associated with the left. The description forgot to mention the carbon tax rate, and the regulations that restrict economic growth. I would be at ease if my children can get jobs.
@9LGL2T412mos12MO
I wouldn't want my children to make nursery rhymes out of big corp.
@9LFNGPJ12mos12MO
No, because if that were true my kids won't be seeing much before they die
@9LFKQV812mos12MO
I cannot influence the major companies to stop using oils.
I think it is really important to preserve natural beauty
@9K72XQF1yr1Y
no this is terrifying please stop pollution. I want kids and grandkids let me reproduce in peace.
@9K5R9V51yr1Y
I would not be at ease because it would be stripping away one of the things I love most about this country and I want my kids to experience the same love.
@9K56XBQ1yr1Y
I would like the environment to be preserved for my children
@9K4N9VC1yr1Y
i would like for the future generatons to see wild life
@9K446FR1yr1Y
No, I would not be at ease knowing that the beauty of nature may not be around for future generations to see. Also, nature serves importance to not only us but the animals and insects as well, all living things support each other in a way and it's beautiful and deserves to be protected.
@9K3F9YCConservative1yr1Y
I am not at ease. This is our Earth we must protect.
@9K29PN7Libertarian1yr1Y
It will still be around, unless the Liberals keep playing with lighters.
@9JZMBGWConservative1yr1Y
absolutely not; our children should be given the same choices we were given when it comes to our planet
@9JYWP2T1yr1Y
I would not be at ease because it would get rid of some generational things in our country such as hockey, skiing and winter sports that helps shape canada
@9JYLZMW1yr1Y
Yes i am fine with that idea because the world is always changing
@9JXC9V21yr1Y
Yes I would because I want my children to see the world I had seen when I was younger.
@9JXFS731yr1Y
it bugs me a lot to know that my kids wont know what some animals were like polarbears.
@9JXC9V21yr1Y
Yes I would because it's not fair that my children can't see the beauty in the world that I had seen
@9JX83WC1yr1Y
I'd be a bit upset to know that my children wouldn't get to experience and see nature. They were born on Earth and they don't get to see its beauty.
I would not be at ease knowing that my children may not be able to enjoy the natural beauty that I enjoyed growing up because they have the right to witness the beauty that I did.
@9JWR98B1yr1Y
I would not be at ease with the notion that natural beauty is not around for my children to see
@9JW3XGW1yr1Y
I would not be at ease if the natural world was to be banished because the human race would follow. We need nature to breathe and survive and even any threat to it should be a global priority.
@9JVR7J31yr1Y
I wouldn't be at ease that is a terrifying concept.
@9JVQSVS1yr1Y
I would like my children to be able to see the natural beauty of the country as it is.
@9JVNRCZ1yr1Y
no because the earth is such a beautiful thing and not being able to show my kids that is quite scary.
@9JVFMSW1yr1Y
no because they will not get to enjoy certant seasonal activities
@9JV2WRX1yr1Y
No, we should be able to maintain a healthy environment without disregarding fiscal responsibility
@9JT48MN1yr1Y
i would not i would like the idea of my children seeing nature and being able to enjoy it
@9JS2P7L1yr1Y
No considering that we aren't the only animal to live here.
@9JQGJKM1yr1Y
As long as there’s photographs and recordings of it, so future children can see the world as it was.
@9JNSV7T1yr1Y
I would be a little bit at ease because I know that nothing lasts forever and that things will change but
i do think we need to make changes so that there is a future for our children to see.
@9JKT7LLConservative1yr1Y
Not particularly but we cannot harm the economy through sweeping environmental policies that are poorly researched.
@9JGM4WL 1yr1Y
no I wouldn't be at ease with it as natural beauty is extremely important for the coming generation to see.
The potential loss of the natural beauty I currently enjoy raises deep concerns about environmental responsibility and the interconnectedness of our actions across generations. It underscores the negative impact of anti-environmentalism on ecosystems and highlights the need for robust environmental education. The notion serves as a powerful motivator for conservation efforts and advocacy for strong environmental policies. It emphasizes the importance of community and global collaboration to address shared environmental challenges. Despite the concerns, it inspires hope and positive action, encouraging individuals to act as custodians of the Earth for the well-being of future generations. Ultimately, it underscores the urgency of safeguarding the wonders of nature for enduring beauty.
I don’t think children should be around to see this.
@9LMRNNW12mos12MO
No, I wouldn't because the nature that we see and that might fade away, I find essential to human growth.
@9LMRND412mos12MO
No, environmentalism is important and conserving green space is important for the health of individuals in a city
@9LLL9TM12mos12MO
Honestly, there isn't much you can say to someone that believes this ideology. It normally turns into an argument with their defenses ALL the way up.
@9LKHKCG12mos12MO
I would not be at ease the new generations don't deserve the issues we caused, no one does
@9L6ZJPW1yr1Y
No, i would not be content with that as i think growing up with at least some nature is essential to aging with respect and love for yourself the world and the people around you.
@9K72T3Z1yr1Y
I like Nature But some of the methods to sole it are stupid like spending like 10m on 10 tiny electric busses in oakville that's a waste and buses don't pollute much
I think they should be building less houses for the immigrants and save the forests
@9K6QSM61yr1Y
no i am not ease because I want my children to have nature around and play outside and feel nature around instead of being inside and on screens all day.
@9K6LKQT1yr1Y
No, I think that the world and environment should be healivy protected and cared for because the earth is our home and it is our job to keep it healthy and alive.
@9K6HR9K1yr1Y
The world heals by itself but we dont need another africa, So no.
No, I wouldn't be at ease, I want my children still the natural that they still enjoy
@9K6429B1yr1Y
I would not be at ease with such a notion, but I doubt my children nor my children’s children will experience such a world where they could not appreciate nature’s beauty.
@9K5WVS61yr1Y
Definitely not, I want my children to witness the natural beauty we see today. I am 100% in favor of saving our environment.
@9K5HRDB1yr1Y
Natural beauty is very important for the environment of country.
@9K5HRDB1yr1Y
I am not in the favor of anti environmentalism . Bcz natural beauty is very important for the country.
@9K3KLRT1yr1Y
no I am not in agree because natural is evident to humanity and is something created by God
No, I would try to preserve the beauty and make the world itself a better Place.
@9K3DWFL1yr1Y
Yeah, I dont mind that, as long as no crime is happening around them.
@9JZCNZW 1yr1Y
it is somewhat sad. but whatever is necessary should be done, world is gonna end sooner or later anyway.
I don't think I would be at ease if my children were not allowed to see what I was able to see because I can not share the experiences that I once had with them.
@9JXWCX31yr1Y
No. The world is a wonderful and peaceful place. Natural beauty not being around means we would have failed as a society to keep our planet clean.
I'm fine with it because it will still be there in years time.
@9JX6MXN1yr1Y
No, I want my children to experience the moments of beauty on our planet that I have been able to so far.
@9JWX53Y1yr1Y
If it's pollution, climate change, or global warming, it will not be safe or good for our health especially children.
@9JWVM231yr1Y
no i am not ease because I want my children to have nature around and play outside and feel nature around instead of being inside and on screens all day.
@9JWS2V71yr1Y
No, at the state that the world is declining in by the time future generations get here and our children to arrive there may be little to no beauty left in this world.
No. It is grossly negligent to allow the natural beauty to be harmed or destroyed. It is for all to enjoy, and the duty of current generations to ensure that future generations will also have access to it for eternity.
@9JVYP461yr1Y
Although I care about environmental health, I'm afraid I have to disagree with the industry regulations as they can pose as one giant special interest group nightmare.
@9JVX2NF1yr1Y
No, I would try to preserve the beauty and make the world itself a better Place.
@9JVMF7W1yr1Y
No. I believe we need to be able to see and enjoy our environment.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
