Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Political party:
Political theme:
Province/Territory:
Electoral District (2011):
@9JWVKD89mos9MO
No, as nature can play a large part in someones well being and mindset. Also aspects of natural beauty like trees play a big part in climate change.
@9K3ML489mos9MO
As the world is changing we are often worried about the lives our children may not see because of the effects climate change is causing.
It will still be there. Climate change is a tax grab and a hoax by the current political government.
@9K5R4VQ9mos9MO
no, the idea that what i'm seeing right now won't be seen by my kids is terrible. i don't want my kids to have to ask what a certain flower smells like, or what a tiger is, or how tall trees could grow.
@9KDMSH39mos9MO
Experiencing nature and the diverse origins of our world is very important, and it's important to keep hold of our roots as animals on this earth.
@9KD9VFV9mos9MO
For the children to have to grow up in the ruins of a planet that we created is a terrifying thought. They should know how natures flourished and nurtures, overall its beauty.
@9JF63CP10mos10MO
no i am not ease because I want my children to have nature around and play outside and feel nature around instead of being inside and on screens all day.
@9JFXCZT10mos10MO
life is possible only because of nature and its creatures. If one of life cycle disturbs, It affects food chains and finally harm species.
@9K56FMFNew Democratic9mos9MO
No, I think it would be a sad life without nature and I don’t know how the world would be able to function without the environment.
@9KD8SGV9mos9MO
Without nature, not only would we lose the natural beauty of our Earth, but we will further diminish our ability to survive.
@9LGCB8Q8mos8MO
I would not. For this reason, I don't want to have kids, as I know our environment only seems to be getting worse. I wouldn't want to make more people live through this, especially my children.
@9LKJ8K97mos7MO
We should try our best to conserve what we have so the next generations will also be able to witness it
@9JKTX6410mos10MO
No I am not I am in favour of an environmental causes and hoping to better and sustain the environment.
@9JRN4YV10mos10MO
Studies show enormous benefits to having public, free greenspace for people of all ages. Children need space to exist that does not have a profit margin attached, greenspace helps to keep the air clean, and our treatment of the environment is already bad enough.
@9K4SSM6New Democratic9mos9MO
I am not in favor of making more buildings and structures and eliminating nature. If I ever have children, I want them to enjoy the wonders of the world and this country. I want them to see the marvelous stuff about nature I once saw.
@9K5QKX89mos9MO
i wouldnt like that but i know that there will be enviomental beauty for my children to see because the govornment knows what they are doing when they cut trees down
@9JXFF3P9mos9MO
No. I would not be at ease. Knowing that my children in the future might not get to see a natural and healthy environment makes me wonder if they'll be getting good education.
@9K4M34N9mos9MO
Without actual proof of a healthy environment schools could phase out the education on a proper environment and further demonize how having a good environment made our economy worse or something stupid
@9JWVZ3L9mos9MO
the thought of the natural beauty I enjoy not being around for my children to see is deeply troubling and concerning. It's saddening to think that future generations might not have the opportunity to experience the awe-inspiring landscapes, diverse ecosystems, and rich biodiversity that our planet offers. The loss of natural beauty not only diminishes our collective heritage but also deprives future generations of the joy, inspiration, and connection to the natural world that I have been fortunate to experience. It underscores the urgency of taking meaningful action to address environmental challenges and protect our planet for the well-being of current and future generations.
@9K2B8L39mos9MO
nature is a fundamental aspect of a childs or any humans life. Why should one not get to experience its benefits, its joy, it's beauty? What did nature ever do to us that we should get rid of it completely??? Also nature was here before us, so how come we destroy it for our petty needs?
@9JTQMJ710mos10MO
No, I am not at ease with this as with our industrialisation and deforestation we damage our planet.
@9JZFGDP9mos9MO
I would not be at ease as there is a concept of sustainability and this is being highlighted as well as made to make the resources available for the future generations as it would benefit them and the world currently. Global warming is at the rise, so the concept of sustainability should be taken into consideration with the help of social, recreational programs to use forests in an environmental friendly way rather than carrying out deforestation at a massive scale. Industrialization should also be done in a sustainable way. In 2022, 2.30 Mha of forest cover Canada lost. It shows that deforestation at a massive scale is being carried out in Canada.
@9JK6CLV10mos10MO
I would not be at ease. My children should be able to grew up with what I grew up with, a nice scenery providing us with fresh air.
@9JQY4HH 10mos10MO
Government of Canada is Nasa is air crafts and freight more then other freighter who's emergency services did the amazing good jobs by safety reason on pliot and the Canada has policy research Inc
@9JD2XG710mos10MO
No. It is grossly negligent to allow the natural beauty to be harmed or destroyed. It is for all to enjoy and the duty of current generations to ensure that future generations will also have access to it for eternity.
@9JJXW9PNew Democratic 10mos10MO
The Natural beauty of canada is one of the things it is most known for and it should not be impacted.
@9P8X8V95mos5MO
It makes me incredibly worried that the natural beauty of our earth will not be around for other generations to see it.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 5mos5MO
No, anti-environmentalism is a selfishly destructive idea.
@9JPWY2810mos10MO
no i think it is a stupid question to ask because only sick people would agree with such
@9JP8JY610mos10MO
No, it's insane to even think about it. In fact, we need to actively preserve and enjoy nature for the next generations.
@9JNSVKYConservative10mos10MO
no, due to how much effort we as a society have put in to making this a safe country
@9JMBJQV10mos10MO
We need to be in the middle do what we can to help the environment but don’t sacrifice jobs
@9JLPBD310mos10MO
Well i cant say that i help the environment that much, but if everyone around me started going green, i would too, and we could have a beautiful green earth, but that is unlikely to happen
@9JLGHHZConservative10mos10MO
No I would not. There are certainly things that must be done in order to ensure that the environment is kept unharmed and development is sustainable for future generations. However the approach currently being taken of increasing taxes and seeking to ban things such as gas vehicles only serves to harm the majority of working and middle class Canadians. The best option in my opinion would be to invest in cleaner energy sources, mainly nuclear, hydro, solar, wind etc, to meet the country’s energy demand. It would also be beneficial to look to pressuring other countries to change their energy grid to more sustainable solutions and to be more environmentally conscious.
@9JHJXGR10mos10MO
I believe that we have a responsibility to live sustainably and preserve our home.
@9JHJFZG10mos10MO
no because i would want them to feel what i feel right now.
@9JP3VGZ10mos10MO
I will not be glad/content with the idea that the environment will be destroyed for the next generation.
@9JNJ8JRNew Democratic10mos10MO
No, we need to preserve nature for all future generations
No, children should not be able to see and be around this!
@9K9STJ29mos9MO
The thought that future generations might not be able to enjoy the same natural beauties and wonders that we do now is disconcerting, but it also serves as a call to action. It draws attention to how urgently we must work together to solve environmental issues, advance sustainability, and protect the earth for next generations.
In the future some things you used to enjoy might not be able for your children,but if they could be able to enjoy what we had, that would be good, but then again some things your children should never be able to see
@9JLF2GL10mos10MO
designated invirmental save zone's and replanting trees should be made but industry is important so designated zones for industry should also be designated. find a massive ugly hole and fill it all the countries waste then cover it up that way to trash.
@9JGF6WP10mos10MO
Many individuals find the idea of losing natural beauty and environmental degradation deeply troubling, especially when considering the potential impact on future generations. If you are environmentally conscious, you might express concern about the consequences of anti-environmental practices and advocate for sustainable actions to ensure the preservation of natural landscapes for your children and future generations to enjoy.
It's common for people to feel a sense of responsibility to protect the environment, understanding that the choices made today can have lasting effects on the planet and the experiences available to those who come after us.
@9LMVKN47mos7MO
No, I would not be at ease. My children should be able to enjoy natural beauty and be able to experience nature.
@9LLTNGFNew Democratic7mos7MO
No it would bother me if my children weren't able to see how beautiful nature is.
If natural being the outside I wouldnt be at ease knowing they wont be able to experience that
@9K65Y6T9mos9MO
I would like my children to see the natural beauty of this world so I would atleast suggest that the government puts money into cleaning the earth and planting trees a bit.
@9K5WY649mos9MO
Anti-environmentalism is like saying global warming doesn't exist.
No I wouldn't be at ease, Your children should see it and know the truth
@9K5QBS9 9mos9MO
no. we need to switch to more renewable energy sources like wind, hydro and nuclear energy for the preservation of our ever-scarred world.
@9K4Z84G9mos9MO
I want nature to be around for a long time and population growth affects that, but I do not agree with climate change.
@9JZSGZC9mos9MO
My children will not die of old age. We are not willing to do what is required to change the future for our planet. It’s time for a rebirth.
@9JZRGP29mos9MO
No I wouldn't everyone should be able to experience the beauty of the world
@9JVXDQ310mos10MO
I would want my kids to be able to enjoy the environment
@9JS5DLR10mos10MO
No, absolutely not. It's not just that they would get to see the natural beauty's of the world, the planet would also because increasingly difficult to live in, and what about their kids? We need to show responsibility for our actions and clean the planet up.
@9JR4C3N10mos10MO
meh if i have kids they better experience the 70s to 90s cars not the goofy electric ones
@9JQ2ZZ810mos10MO
I personally like the cities people have created so personally I would not mind if I never see a forest again. But I don't think it is fair to people who do like the environment.
@9JHCXP210mos10MO
It's a sad fate that younger generations might not be able to see the environment to the extent that we do.
@9JFXCZT10mos10MO
Considering the stance on "Anti-Environmentalism," it might be unsettling to think that the current natural beauty enjoyed might not persist for one's children. This highlights the significance of environmental stewardship to safeguard landscapes and ecosystems for the well-being of future generations.
@9LLNN4T7mos7MO
No, I think more needs to be done about climate change
@9LL92B47mos7MO
we need to stand up for our land bc its all we got we need for people to accept that if our land if gone how we gonna survive
@9LKHV3T7mos7MO
Yeah as long as we can live happy lives with total access to everything
@9LKHLWL7mos7MO
"Anti-Environmentalism" isn't a label that is commonly used by the right-wing. From my point of view, I can't help but notice that the notion of "eco-friendly" ideology is well associated with the left. The description forgot to mention the carbon tax rate, and the regulations that restrict economic growth. I would be at ease if my children can get jobs.
@9LGL2T48mos8MO
I wouldn't want my children to make nursery rhymes out of big corp.
@9LFNGPJ8mos8MO
No, because if that were true my kids won't be seeing much before they die
@9LFKQV88mos8MO
I cannot influence the major companies to stop using oils.
@9LBC75N8mos8MO
Obviously not, it's a huge issue. However, we always criticize and blame Canadian politicians. I am in fact very proud of them, we have done alot as a country. There's always more to do, but they have done so much and have made so much progress, besides of that electric car industry garbage, that we call environmentally friendly. For those who are interested in buying an electric car, please do your research and never buy one of these horrible products that literally destroy the earth. There is no real 100 percent sustainable solution, and people who say that are delusional. Resourc… Read more
@9L9LGGR8mos8MO
It horrifies and saddens me that we would sacrifice it for the privilege of an elite few to profit. We must take action to prevent it. Our natural beauty is a gift that should not be defiled if we can help it.
@9L938GCNew Democratic8mos8MO
I think it is really important to preserve natural beauty
@9K72XQF9mos9MO
no this is terrifying please stop pollution. I want kids and grandkids let me reproduce in peace.
No, i believe everyone should see the earth beauty.
@9K64YTN9mos9MO
I hate that the government is cutting down trees but luckily here in Canada we have many protected lands for grass trees and plants
@9K5R9V59mos9MO
I would not be at ease because it would be stripping away one of the things I love most about this country and I want my kids to experience the same love.
@9K5QKX89mos9MO
i think the enviroment is not in the shape that others put it to be for exaple the old groth forest, it is old forest that is going to die anyway and we should put that resource to work, they also replant the forests that get cut down.
@9K56XBQ9mos9MO
I would like the environment to be preserved for my children
@9K544ZP9mos9MO
Absolutely not. I won’t ever have children, but the idea that the world I know won’t be around for the next generation is horrible to think about.
@9K4SHF3Conservative9mos9MO
As someone who appreciates the natural beauty of the world, it would definitely concern me to think that future generations might not have the same opportunity to experience it. It's important for us to take care of the environment and work towards sustainable practices to preserve the beauty of nature for future generations. We can all play a part in making a positive impact on the environment, whether it's through small actions like reducing waste or supporting initiatives that promote conservation. Together, we can strive to ensure that the natural beauty we enjoy today will still be there for our children to experience tomorrow.
@9K4N9VC9mos9MO
i would like for the future generatons to see wild life
@9K446FR9mos9MO
No, I would not be at ease knowing that the beauty of nature may not be around for future generations to see. Also, nature serves importance to not only us but the animals and insects as well, all living things support each other in a way and it's beautiful and deserves to be protected.
@9K3JGRF9mos9MO
I want my children and grandchildren to live in a clean and beautiful world. I won't be completely at ease knowing that they may not have the opportunity to see the beautiful sights that older generations were able to see.
@9K3F9YCConservative9mos9MO
I am not at ease. This is our Earth we must protect.
@9K2BRHY9mos9MO
it will be sad. i hope we will be able to save this greenery for a few more 100 years, atleast.
@9K29PN7Libertarian9mos9MO
It will still be around, unless the Liberals keep playing with lighters.
@9JZVYL6New Democratic 9mos9MO
No, I do not want future generations to experience a world devoid of what makes that world so special. I also do not want them to have to experience corporatocracy or the consequences that come with extreme industrialization.
@9JZMBGWConservative9mos9MO
absolutely not; our children should be given the same choices we were given when it comes to our planet
@9JZ9VKC9mos9MO
I feel like the future generations should be able to see the nature because its pretty and reduces stress.
@9JYWP2T9mos9MO
I would not be at ease because it would get rid of some generational things in our country such as hockey, skiing and winter sports that helps shape canada
@9JYLZMW9mos9MO
Yes i am fine with that idea because the world is always changing
@9JXC9V29mos9MO
Yes I would because I want my children to see the world I had seen when I was younger.
@9JXR7T59mos9MO
no i love the earth and environment and we should take care of it
No, I love seeing nature and it means so much to me and how I live. I couldn’t imagine my kids not being able to see the things I have been able to see, and be able to explore these things while they are still here.
@9JXFS739mos9MO
it bugs me a lot to know that my kids wont know what some animals were like polarbears.
@9JXC9V29mos9MO
Yes I would because it's not fair that my children can't see the beauty in the world that I had seen
@9JX83WC9mos9MO
I'd be a bit upset to know that my children wouldn't get to experience and see nature. They were born on Earth and they don't get to see its beauty.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
