Would you be at ease with the notion that the natural beauty you enjoy may not be around for your children to see?

No I would not. There are certainly things that must be done in order to ensure that the environment is kept unharmed and development is sustainable for future generations. However the approach currently being taken of increasing taxes and seeking to ban things such as gas vehicles only serves to harm the majority of working and middle class Canadians. The best option in my opinion would be to invest in cleaner energy sources, mainly nuclear, hydro, solar, wind etc, to meet the country’s energy demand. It would also be beneficial to look to pressuring other countries to change their energy grid to more sustainable solutions and to be more environmentally conscious.

In the future some things you used to enjoy might not be able for your children,but if they could be able to enjoy what we had, that would be good, but then again some things your children should never be able to see

As someone who appreciates the natural beauty of the world, it would definitely concern me to think that future generations might not have the same opportunity to experience it. It's important for us to take care of the environment and work towards sustainable practices to preserve the beauty of nature for future generations. We can all play a part in making a positive impact on the environment, whether it's through small actions like reducing waste or supporting initiatives that promote conservation. Together, we can strive to ensure that the natural beauty we enjoy today will still be there for our children to experience tomorrow.

I am not at ease. This is our Earth we must protect.

absolutely not; our children should be given the same choices we were given when it comes to our planet

Yea, Canada is not the reason why the carbon emissions are so high, probably contributes 1% while china and india is 50%.

It most likely will not be around anyway. The majority of people are too selfish to give up meat/vehicles (when theres accessible transit) or even have slightly higher taxes for the better of our community. It also doesn’t help when our Prime Minister doesn’t actually do anything that was promised and no one holds him accountable.

No, but fear mongering that irs going away is a red herring.

I say that God will control the end of the world and humans don't control the world.

Not particularly but we cannot harm the economy through sweeping environmental policies that are poorly researched.

No, I would be concerned if it ever gets to that level

we should focus on saving on our planet because it's dying and we live off of everything on this planet, from the animals, the earth, the water. the planet should be our main priority.

I think they should be building less houses for the immigrants and save the forests

I'm fine with it because it will still be there in years time.

No i think it is incredibly important that we try and preserve the environment that we are priviledged enough to be graced with so that future generations may be able to enjoy it as well

I would be at ease with the notion that natural beauty i enjoy may not be around for children to see as things get depreciated over time and fade away as a monument can get worn down by weather such as heaving rain, storms, things like this.

Yes, I would not care. Society is going to end eventually anyway as our current political system is unsustainable as the middle class continues to expand both from corporate consolidation and immigration. May take hundreds of years or a couple decades for the U.S to lose their stranglehold on the world for a global war of epic proportions.

it would make me sad to see that my kids would not be able to see the beauty that was given to us and that we probably are going to take away.

I think that it is very sad to think that my children might not get to see nature’s beauty.

It'd be a very sad thing, but stopping society in its tracks to prevent this vision of the future would be foolish.

Canada is a large and beautiful country which will hold its natural beauty for many more generations to come.

No because I would be upset if my kids do not touch grass

Yes, I’m bit concerned about nature. Because in upcoming years the weather will be changed a lot and according to my opinion it will not favour us anymore.

i like how we can drive to the mountains and see what Canada looked like before it was touched by humans. i don't like the feeling that we might lose that in the future.

No, but I feel like there is only so much in our control. The world population continues to grow and because of that, it is unsustainable for our planet. We are almost guaranteed to lose many of our environments because there is no feasible way to stop that.

i would be at ease because we need to use the resources that we are using. carbonization should always be a thing. but i dont believe the natural beauty will ever go away.

No I think that natural beauty should be seen around my children because they will see how natural beauty can be really beautiful and that they can be comfortable to let others seen their own natural beauty.

the earth is not going to end from co2 but we should be worried about cities throwing stuff every where.

no i am not ease because I want my children to have nature around and play outside and feel nature around instead of being inside and on screens all day.

I am not happy about how future generations are going to live environmentally because it is not comforting

I would not be at ease as I have already seen enough change throughout my 15 years of living and try to go up north as much as I can and plan on moving up there.

I would be at ease with the notion that the natural beauty i enjoy may not be around for yhour children to see because things depreciate over time like a statue gets rain and wet with heavy storms.

This is a loaded question that reeks of an agenda. I greatly value the beauty that makes up an enormous and wondrous part of Canada and hate to see its destruction. But, I also detest the thought of elitists thinking that they know what is best for the masses, who fund bogus "scientific" studies to drive their agendas, who control privately run lending operations to corrupt governments and who are the worst sort of criminals on the planet.

No I want the nature for myself, keep it around. Add more nature.

I certainly won't be at ease to see my children not see what I would see.

That definitely makes me nervous because if we do not do more to protect our environment then our future kids and grandkids will live in a less safe and dangerous economy.

This is a loaded question intended to get me to make a pro-environmentalist stance, if anyone from ISideWith reads this, I advise you remove this, as though I agree that we need to solve numerous issues, such as CO2 emissions and plastic pollution and am very concerned for our environment, the right way to go about this is not to try to trick people into agreeing with you through manipulative statements. The same can be said for the second question I have received "In response to the topic of “Ecologism” what would you say to someone who believes their actions are too small to make a difference for the environment?" though to a lesser degree as rather than guilting them, you are merely assuming an environmentalists stance.

no! natural beauty is amazing and should be persevred

No but don't pass more harmful legislation under the guise of "enviromentalism"

No, I would want my children to be able to see the best the world has to offer.

we have to work together to save our animals, that they do not become extinct and also our environment that does not create a damage effect on our lives.