Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Political theme:
Province/Territory:
Electoral District (2011):
No, I think it would be a sad life without nature and I don’t know how the world would be able to function without the environment.
@9KD8SGV1yr1Y
Without nature, not only would we lose the natural beauty of our Earth, but we will further diminish our ability to survive.
I am not in favor of making more buildings and structures and eliminating nature. If I ever have children, I want them to enjoy the wonders of the world and this country. I want them to see the marvelous stuff about nature I once saw.
@9K5QKX81yr1Y
i wouldnt like that but i know that there will be enviomental beauty for my children to see because the govornment knows what they are doing when they cut trees down
@9P8X8V910mos10MO
It makes me incredibly worried that the natural beauty of our earth will not be around for other generations to see it.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 10mos10MO
No, anti-environmentalism is a selfishly destructive idea.
No, we need to preserve nature for all future generations
@9LLTNGFNew Democratic12mos12MO
No it would bother me if my children weren't able to see how beautiful nature is.
I think it is really important to preserve natural beauty
@9JZVYL6New Democratic 1yr1Y
No, I do not want future generations to experience a world devoid of what makes that world so special. I also do not want them to have to experience corporatocracy or the consequences that come with extreme industrialization.
It does not have to be the exact same, but I would not be at ease if the natural beauty is not breathable for my children.
@9JQ3XL21yr1Y
No, we should be working to preserve the environment.
@9JZCNZW 1yr1Y
it is somewhat sad. but whatever is necessary should be done, world is gonna end sooner or later anyway.
I don't think I would be at ease if my children were not allowed to see what I was able to see because I can not share the experiences that I once had with them.
@9JYLP3N1yr1Y
as a worker in the outdoor trades that idea makes me extremely uncomfortable.
@9JXPD9F1yr1Y
No, I would try to preserve the beauty and make the world itself a better Place.
No. It is grossly negligent to allow the natural beauty to be harmed or destroyed. It is for all to enjoy, and the duty of current generations to ensure that future generations will also have access to it for eternity.
No my children deserve to like in a world not harmed by climate change.
i dont belave it i thnik the worelds fine they will see snow rain sun all of it
@9LLQ7JMNew Democratic12mos12MO
Industrialization, and Manufacturing and Capital Intensive Industry should be given more importance.
@9LK2YSN12mos12MO
its kind of sad knowing that my kids will live in a world of bad air quality and dying environment and wont be able to experience the beauty of nature as it is now.
No environment should be worked on to build homes but not on all land.
@9LJYZBX12mos12MO
No, we need to fix climate change denning it or downplaying it it stupid.
No I would not. It is important for us to preserve these areas.
Accepting that future generations may not experience the natural beauty we enjoy challenges us to prioritize environmental conservation urgently for their sake.
@9L2SXDR1yr1Y
Absolutely not. And it wouldn't just affect the view - it would impact their everyday lives in a way we don't seem to have fully comprehended yet.
@9JCWJLH 1yr1Y
I would not. I hope this generation manages to conserve its natural resources so that those to come may also appreciate natures wonders and understand its central place in our futures.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
