Would you be at ease with the notion that the natural beauty you enjoy may not be around for your children to see?

No I would not. There are certainly things that must be done in order to ensure that the environment is kept unharmed and development is sustainable for future generations. However the approach currently being taken of increasing taxes and seeking to ban things such as gas vehicles only serves to harm the majority of working and middle class Canadians. The best option in my opinion would be to invest in cleaner energy sources, mainly nuclear, hydro, solar, wind etc, to meet the country’s energy demand. It would also be beneficial to look to pressuring other countries to change their energy grid to more sustainable solutions and to be more environmentally conscious.

Yeah as long as we can live happy lives with total access to everything

"Anti-Environmentalism" isn't a label that is commonly used by the right-wing. From my point of view, I can't help but notice that the notion of "eco-friendly" ideology is well associated with the left. The description forgot to mention the carbon tax rate, and the regulations that restrict economic growth. I would be at ease if my children can get jobs.

As someone who appreciates the natural beauty of the world, it would definitely concern me to think that future generations might not have the same opportunity to experience it. It's important for us to take care of the environment and work towards sustainable practices to preserve the beauty of nature for future generations. We can all play a part in making a positive impact on the environment, whether it's through small actions like reducing waste or supporting initiatives that promote conservation. Together, we can strive to ensure that the natural beauty we enjoy today will still be there for our children to experience tomorrow.

I am not at ease. This is our Earth we must protect.

absolutely not; our children should be given the same choices we were given when it comes to our planet

I would not be at ease because it would get rid of some generational things in our country such as hockey, skiing and winter sports that helps shape canada

Yea, Canada is not the reason why the carbon emissions are so high, probably contributes 1% while china and india is 50%.

It most likely will not be around anyway. The majority of people are too selfish to give up meat/vehicles (when theres accessible transit) or even have slightly higher taxes for the better of our community. It also doesn’t help when our Prime Minister doesn’t actually do anything that was promised and no one holds him accountable.

No, but fear mongering that irs going away is a red herring.

I say that God will control the end of the world and humans don't control the world.

Not particularly but we cannot harm the economy through sweeping environmental policies that are poorly researched.

No, I would be concerned if it ever gets to that level

Of course, there will be some of it, but the environment is not as bad as people think. It is an issue though and we need to begin switching to nuclear, instead of the "Carbon Tax" that is killing Canada.

No I would like to maintain the environment just not through extremes.

I love the out doors and think people should protect it more. So no

The earth has been here for billions of years and will be here long after humans are gone. A massive country like Canada, with 40 million people, will not be able to fix and repair the environment, while countries with 1.4 billion people, like India and China, have zero regard for polluting the planet. Do you think Trudeau's Carbon Tax is going to fix anything? It is not. All he is doing is causing the people of Canada hardships with their hard-earned money.

Don’t hurt the environment but keep industries alive

I believe that There should be parts of the world, each country should have multiple. land masses required to be natural

No i think it is incredibly important that we try and preserve the environment that we are priviledged enough to be graced with so that future generations may be able to enjoy it as well

I would be at ease with the notion that natural beauty i enjoy may not be around for children to see as things get depreciated over time and fade away as a monument can get worn down by weather such as heaving rain, storms, things like this.

I think that the Environment does matter but we can't protect everything.

Yes, I would not care. Society is going to end eventually anyway as our current political system is unsustainable as the middle class continues to expand both from corporate consolidation and immigration. May take hundreds of years or a couple decades for the U.S to lose their stranglehold on the world for a global war of epic proportions.

I think that it is very sad to think that my children might not get to see nature’s beauty.

It'd be a very sad thing, but stopping society in its tracks to prevent this vision of the future would be foolish.

Canada is a large and beautiful country which will hold its natural beauty for many more generations to come.

i think people shoud be able to do and wear what they want

i like how we can drive to the mountains and see what Canada looked like before it was touched by humans. i don't like the feeling that we might lose that in the future.

No, but I feel like there is only so much in our control. The world population continues to grow and because of that, it is unsustainable for our planet. We are almost guaranteed to lose many of our environments because there is no feasible way to stop that.

i would be at ease because we need to use the resources that we are using. carbonization should always be a thing. but i dont believe the natural beauty will ever go away.

No I think that natural beauty should be seen around my children because they will see how natural beauty can be really beautiful and that they can be comfortable to let others seen their own natural beauty.

no i am not ease because I want my children to have nature around and play outside and feel nature around instead of being inside and on screens all day.

I am not happy about how future generations are going to live environmentally because it is not comforting

I would not be at ease as I have already seen enough change throughout my 15 years of living and try to go up north as much as I can and plan on moving up there.

I would be at ease with the notion that the natural beauty i enjoy may not be around for yhour children to see because things depreciate over time like a statue gets rain and wet with heavy storms.

No. I love going to the mountains and fishing, quadding, campfires, etc. It sucks that it could all go away soon. There needs to be more of an effort to protect the animals and wildlife, so we don't turn into a place where a tree becomes a rare novelty.

That definitely makes me nervous because if we do not do more to protect our environment then our future kids and grandkids will live in a less safe and dangerous economy.

This is a loaded question intended to get me to make a pro-environmentalist stance, if anyone from ISideWith reads this, I advise you remove this, as though I agree that we need to solve numerous issues, such as CO2 emissions and plastic pollution and am very concerned for our environment, the right way to go about this is not to try to trick people into agreeing with you through manipulative statements. The same can be said for the second question I have received "In response to the topic of “Ecologism” what would you say to someone who believes their actions are too small to make a difference for the environment?" though to a lesser degree as rather than guilting them, you are merely assuming an environmentalists stance.

No but don't pass more harmful legislation under the guise of "enviromentalism"

No I would not. It is important for us to preserve these areas.

No, I would want my children to be able to see the best the world has to offer.

we have to work together to save our animals, that they do not become extinct and also our environment that does not create a damage effect on our lives.