Privatization of healthcare has been shown to make life-saving treatments harder and in some cases impossible to fund for low-medium income households and even in some cases financially cripple households. The argument that privatized insurance would make up for this is flawed by the very nature of privatized insurance companies being motivated by profit and having on several cases found loopholes to avoid covering in full or in part, the cost of the treatment.
Universally Funded healthcare on average costs less for each individual in added taxes than privatized insurance will, as well as having less incentive to lawyer up to prevent aiding you in the funding of your medical bills. This means that you are less likely to end up in debt, or dead due to inability to fund any medical emergencies. The only people who benefit from privatized healthcare are those who are willing and financially capable to turn profits from others suffering.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.
Join in on more popular conversations.