Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomyStarted 11yrs agoActive 3wks ago

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political party:

Province/Territory:

10 Replies

 @8CS4GM7answered…5yrs5Y

Emphasize health coverage benefits. There should not be tens of millions of uninsured American citizens under any circumstances.

 @IINXMP from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

More, and abolish some welfare programs.

 @4ZTD62Kanswered…4yrs4Y

Welfare as it is should be eliminated and replaced with local and community-based initiatives raised from local income, sales and property taxes.

 @dandymananswered…4yrs4Y

Fewer, and progressively provide aid according to need to ensure a smooth transition off of welfare

 @EthanHars from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

Repeal and replace with UBI

 @8CN7P7L from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

More, do drug test and give it to immigrants that pay taxes

 @8HK5TN2 from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

it should stay the same

 @8HX2KD5 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

The government should only subsidize individuals who are unable to work.

 @8KRN6JB from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

I don't think restrictions should be made. However, there should be a time cap put on the program. The program should be used to get back on your feet, not to live off of for the rest of your life.

 @93DHP4B from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

More, and eliminate illegally resident aliens from benefits.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

The Great Progressive Exodus: Inside the Left's War Against Harris

One of the central mysteries of this election has been to what extent the left will defect from Democrats, potentially costing Harris the election with votes for JILL STEIN or CORNEL WEST. Stein is far from concerned about that, NYT’s Matt Flegenheimer captures in a lengthy and dishy profile. For the first time ever, Democrats are launching an ad campaign against a third-party candidate (Stein) over the coming weeks. And even Stein’s own family and friends tell the Times they don’t support her and urged her not to run. Stein, whose “bid can feel precision-engineered to damage Ms. Harris with key subgroups,” pooh-poohs what she calls the “spoiler mythology” and places the blame squarely on Democrats.On college campuses, there are some signs that the left-wing protest movement has quieted from its peak when Biden was in the race — but even a small number of defections from Dems could prove pivotal in a close election.In East Lansing, Zack Stanton reports for POLITICO Magazine that Michigan State student activists furious about the Israel-Hamas war are torn between demanding more from Harris and stopping Trump. In Chapel Hill, WSJ’s Jimmy Vielkind and Cam Pollack find that many pro-Palestinian protesters at the University of North Carolina are nonetheless weighing other issues in their vote, especially abortion rights. But liberal groups are warning that some undecided voters of color still don’t feel like they know enough to be convinced for Harris — and may leave the top of the ticket blank, AP’s Ayanna Alexander reports.

▲  412 replies