Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Yes, and nationalize all energy.
Yes, while also providing aid to help the fossil fuels industry transition to greener technology.
The federal government should be proud of our natural resources and support this sector fully and stop preventing us from getting resources to market. Our federal government should fully support oil and natural gas and do everything they can to make Canada top player in this area. Other countries have made fools of Canada and Canadians by pitting us against each other in order to stop us from being a top oil producer in the world. Our politicians have done us a huge disservice and they should be incredibly ashamed. They are running our country. We have produced our oil ethically and respon… Read more
Yes, but only in the initial stages of devlopment
Production should be subsidized, but not consumption.
More important to eliminate current subsidies given to oil and gas
yes but reasonable spending of funds
No, but provide benefits to companies that use/produce renewable energy
Only if we have something better to replace it with that the public favors.
To a certain extent, while it remains less prominent and financially feasible yes, when more corporations are producing and consuming green energy they should be systematically decreased.
The government should worry about the environment
They should subsidize the production and consumption, but not so much
i think the government should make everyone consume renewable vape sources
Yes, for renewable energy sources that will not be obsolete in the next 20 years
Yes and no, depending on people’s incomes
Yes if it is within the budget
Yes, specifically nuclear fusion.
Yes, we should. It's in our national interest to develop energy independence, as well as continue our power as a lead exporter of energy, whether it be in oil and gas, and natural resource development, or exporting renewable tech to other nations. It's also good for us to develop it as it can show the world the potential that it has.
i agree that subsidies are a good thing but i don't think tax payers should fund ventures that make corporations millions and millions of dollars without a payback option.
No, they should expand renewable energy sources instead of non- renewable so that not so much pollution and harm to the environment is made
Targeted strategically at renewable and non-renewable
Yes but keep all current energy sources that would be hard to get rid of.
yes, this is how a government help us save our environment to the next generations.
They should make natural energy sources for less polution
When oil stops substized
Yes the government should as long as it works from a capitalist view
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.