Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @9RXF7FTfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

No, the government should get involved in the housing market and create supply in order to deflate the housing bubble.

 @9GG6WCKfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I do not think that the government should subside for the people making less money but maybe implicate a few homes that are more affordable for this reason

 @9FTFDYYGreenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should subsidize those who were originally able to afford a home on their salary, but may lose it to circumstances evidently out of control.

 @8KKDBQ9Greenfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

120k is a TON of money. I’d rather see the down payment minimum go down or the stress test percentage

 @964KCWMGreenfrom Prince Edward Island  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92PRD66Greenfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VJJT6NGreenfrom Nunavut  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the government needs to make more jobs and force the real estate agents to stop setting the market prices so high.

 @8VHKSPVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

You should be able to apply for subsidized housing based on low income with easier access then there is currently

 @8TLNMCNfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but for home buyers who make less than $65,000 per year and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation.

 @8T3RNG5from Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SHN348from Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

It depends on the amount earned and amount of people depending on the home buyer

 @8CRJ6QPGreenfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

depends like they should help them out a but not give them a super nice house because all they people who work hard for there house its kinda pointless now after all that hard work. I would help them out but I would give money instead of a house.

 @9CLM482from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

They should subsidize the homeless, and very poor who can barely get by paying bills. For example, those who make less than 40k a year.

 @9C5YNV9Greenfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

If they cant have enough money to get a house they shouldn't have one, they should rent it also it depends on if they have kids.

 @9BYMWRGGreenfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and it should act firmly to protect renters from predatory landlords. However it should also protect landlords from nightmare tenants.

 @8Y8M2GFGreenfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Foreign buyers should be restricted to buying more than one property and be limited to only buying Northern properties to keep the housing market affordable for Canadians.

 @8X2LM59from British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

It depends on their situation, we should not just tax the rich, although we still need to help people and their basic needs.

 @8WKVMTHGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

depending on how much a man makes, if a man makes less 50,000 will get better support than a man who makes 100,000

 @8WBR2GHGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...