Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsDomestic Policy11yrs ago

Should the federal government elect or abolish the Senate?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Political party:

Ideology:

Province/Territory:

Reply

 @8QYJ7M9Conservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

They should reform the senate

 @9H6RB6LConservativefrom New York  answered…1yr1Y

Transfer appointments to the provincial legislatures, equalize the number of senators per province, and impose a staggered terms of eight years

 @8TYN53SLibertarianfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

We should abolish government period.

 @8QVGNR7Conservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Elect and reapportion the seats so that each province has an equal number.

 @8PZG5QPConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Reconfigure it. 3 senators per province, 1 for each territory total 33 vice 98 and elected by provincial electors.

 @8NWS92GConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

The Senate should be elected by the citizens

 @8NVZHNKLibertarianfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

The People should elect the Senate not Parliment

 @8CG85VWLibertarianfrom Manitoba  answered…5yrs5Y

Elected partisan senate, but introduce a means test to ensure only solid citizens are running.

 @8SZX386Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Elected and representation in the Senate based on population of the province

 @8TWDTHBConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Elect. Triple-E

 @8GPVK3SConservativefrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

Equally Elected by all equal number of party MP's to ensure nonpartisanship.

  @buday4vancouverLibertarian from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

An open ballot of Candidates should be presented to Provincial Legislatures in which 2 will be Elected for terms of 2 and 6 years in each province and appointed as such. It should be a free vote.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Trump hits ‘nasty’ Michelle Obama at Atlanta rally

Former President Trump attacked former first lady Michelle Obama during his rally in Atlanta on Monday, calling her “nasty” after Obama lobbed attacks at the former president while stumping for Vice President Harris.“You know who’s nasty to me? Michelle Obama,” Trump told supporters in Atlanta.“I always tried to be so nice and respectful. Oh, she opened up a little bit of — a little bit of a box. She opened up a little bit of something. Oh, she was nasty. Shouldn’t be that way. That was a big mistake that she made,” he added.His remarks come after Obama criticized Trump during a Michigan rally on Saturday, at one point mentioning “Donald Trump’s gross incompetence.”“I hope that you’ll forgive me if I’m a little angry that we are indifferent to his erratic behavior, his obvious mental decline, his history as a convicted felon, a known slum lord, a predator found liable for sexual abuse, all of this while we pick apart Kamala’s answers from interviews that he doesn’t even have the courage to do, y’all,” she said in Kalamazoo, Mich.The heated rhetoric underscores the increasingly personal tone the presidential election has taken between the two campaigns roughly one week out from the election.An aggregate of national surveys compiled by The Hill/Decision Desk HQ shows Harris slightly ahead at close to 49 percent support while Trump is at 48 percent.

▲  3316 replies

Active 24hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1027 replies