Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHAnswersHealthcare7yrs ago

No

Reply

 @B25947Cfrom Ontario  agreed…4mos4MO

oh naw i aint doing this its the same as the one four questions ago ima just walk away if dog's brain cannot comprehend what I'm speaking about

 @9ZS8S4RIndependent from Ontario  disagreed…5mos5MO

Opening safe heavens for people who use drugs would be good and cause less death, not only that but people could actually consider getting help instead of just getting worse

 @9ZXF67Qfrom Ontario  agreed…5mos5MO

Around 21 million (6%) of the population in Canada are addicts tied to drugs. Due to drugs and their highly addictive quality. more and more people will be unsensible and fall deeper down, with nothing to stop them from Safe Haven enabling them.

 @9ZTMV3Nfrom Ontario  agreed…5mos5MO

The only case of drugs disappearing without criminal law enforcement is heroin, and it’s because it was so harmful all consumers eventually died, so the cooks had no market left.

 @9VHCBJMfrom Ontario  agreed…7mos7MO

people while on these drugs can be unpredictable and the methods that they'd go to get their fix could and most likely would be unethical.

 @9GZ8BL3New Democraticfrom Ontario  agreed…1yr1Y

Safe Haven doesn't solve the problem of drug addiction, it just lets people be addicted under medical supervision. Rehabilitation under medical care is the best possible solution to help drug addicts remove themselves from any harmful substances.

 @9G2CWHCfrom Ontario  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I believe that the safe havens can eventually phase drug addicts out of addiction and into a better life free of drugs.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

FBI Director Chris Wray Will Resign

The F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, told bureau employees on Wednesday that he intended to resign before the Trump administration begins, bowing to the reality that President-elect Donald J. Trump had publicly declared his desire to replace him.Mr. Wray made the disclosure while addressing employees Wednesday afternoon in remarks that tacitly acknowledged the politically charged position the F.B.I. now faces with an incoming president who openly scorns the agency.“I’ve decided the right thing for the bureau is for me to serve until the end of the current administration in January and then step down,” Mr. Wray said, adding, “This is the best way to avoid dragging the bureau deeper into the fray, while reinforcing the values and principles that are so important to how we do our work.”The director spoke wistfully about his time at the F.B.I. “This is not easy for me,” he said. “I love this place, I love our mission and I love our people.”The announcement comes after Mr. Trump said in late November that he intended to nominate Kash Patel, a longtime loyalist, to run the F.B.I., and more than two years before Mr. Wray’s 10-year term would have expired.Paul Abbate, the deputy F.B.I. director, is set to retire in April but would typically serve as acting director until Mr. Patel is confirmed. It is not clear who would replace Mr. Abbate, the most senior agent in the bureau.Over more than seven years, Mr. Wray oversaw one of the most consequential and tumultuous periods in the bureau’s history, juggling high-profile criminal investigations of political figures, heated congressional inquiries and two attempted assassinations of Mr. Trump.

▲  177 replies

Active 1wk ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1127 replies