Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political theme:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation
@9VG5CQ2New Democratic7mos7MO
Should spend more on public transportation for people with disabilities, like services such as Handy-dart and training of taxi drivers to take passengers with mobility devices
@9KHWY2CNew Democratic 1yr1Y
Yes, and drastically expand environmentally friendly transportation to remote areas in canada, at an affordable rate
@9F9V2NRNew Democratic2yrs2Y
Yes, everything except the light rail.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 10mos10MO
Yes, and provide more free public transportation which also has spending going towards more environmentally friendly solutions.
@93CR3BHNew Democratic3yrs3Y
Provide cheaper public transit that’s environmentally friendly. I want two stances here.
@8YJZR9LNew Democratic3yrs3Y
they probably should but just not to much
@8VV33XFNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, and more reach into rural geographies
@8VMWV7LNew Democratic4yrs4Y
I think the government should increase spending at high density populations but decrease spending on low density populations.
@8VD46V7New Democratic4yrs4Y
yes, and more free public transportation and ecofriendly solutions should be prioritized
@8V9DCT5New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, including infrastructure for sidewalks and dedicated bike paths. This will reduce the amount of cars on the road.
@8TZ33FZNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, we need to make transportation in our remote areas more accessible and dependable.
@8TQTW27New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but direct spending towards environmentally friendly solutions and provide more free public transportation
@8TD69HWNew Democratic4yrs4Y
No, but current spending should go towards more environmentally friendly solutions
@8RPTFHLNew Democratic4yrs4Y
No, and funding should be redirected from public transit into electric vehicle subsidies to make electric vehicles more accessible to low income families
@8QXR442New Democratic4yrs4Y
There is no public transportation where I live
@8KNT72ZNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Reduce costs, increase rider ship. Why do they need to spend more!? What is the long-term plan!?
@8DN9QDDNew Democratic5yrs5Y
We must address the aging ferry issues. They provide the necessary link between mainland and islands in emergency situations. Passenger ferry to Vancouver Island a must
@9CMSLDJNew Democratic2yrs2Y
it is not important to either increase or decrease the speed of public transport however, the government could try to make public transits more avalaiable
@8TXKY7YNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes in the less dense areas
@9CLGM6WNew Democratic2yrs2Y
I think the government should lower the cost of public transportation, and use money towards environmntally friendly solutions
@99Z3579New Democratic2yrs2Y
Yes, but some of that extra funding should go towards more environmentally friendly solutions.
@99QD3KMNew Democratic2yrs2Y
Yes as people won't use their vehicles that much and lower gas emissions.
@8RBQDDP2yrs2Y
Yes, but it should be cost effective and environmentally friendly
@938PWY63yrs3Y
The government should increase spending on making private transportation more efficient.
@887SFZP4yrs4Y
Yes; provide more free public transportation and reform our infrastructure as to limit our dependency on automobiles in favor of trains, subways, etc.
@8RBQDDP4yrs4Y
Yes, but it should be cost effective
@8PMGCVG4yrs4Y
I am neither opposed nor for it.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
