Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political theme:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation
@9VW5KW2Conservative6mos6MO
It depends, I think densification of cities and towns would make increased public transit more feasible in Canada. Until then public transport is not a great means of transportation.
@9VG7P4VConservative7mos7MO
Yes, by adding more routes and hours of service. We don't live in a 9-5 society anymore and our public transportation should reflect that
@9JRD5WLConservative1yr1Y
Depending on what they use the money for. If they start using it for environmentally friendly transportation then no. But if it is used to create more highways, busses running on gas and to keep it all clean then yes.
@9GYC866Conservative1yr1Y
The government if they had extra money after upgrading infrastructure they should put it into public transport
@9FDLC9KConservative2yrs2Y
No, unless the government builds bullet trains from Windsor to Quebec City.
@9MCJ3PYConservative11mos11MO
It really depends because yes we can have more public transit like rentable e bikes and scooters but we already have buses and bikes so why waste the money when it could go to housing
@9LFH2B9Conservative1yr1Y
spending should be higher as distance decreases until you want to go outside the city in order to encourage private transportation
@9D5WBPDConservative2yrs2Y
I think its a more provincial thing and not so much federal
@93TQ9LRConservative3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if it's reliable
@8ZHV85NConservative3yrs3Y
Only if the funding is required to keep with population growth
@8VW6JQVConservative4yrs4Y
Only if it reduces congestion like subways and skytrains
@8VW5FBZConservative4yrs4Y
Government should invest in public transportation projects that are budget friendly, efficient and worth it to do it.
@8V5QR4YConservative4yrs4Y
Yes and provide funding to help rural communities with transportation to help increase employment opportunities.
@8TX7JTCConservative4yrs4Y
If the transit and their contractors will stick to the schedules and plans... yes... but prolong it, it’ll cause great deficits...
@8TTNR44Conservative4yrs4Y
Any and all busing that pertains to elementary, middle & secondary should be free as it use to be for many years
@8QZF8Q4Conservative4yrs4Y
I don’t use public transportation and have no opinion
@8PV677JConservative4yrs4Y
Make a functional public transit system but keep the fees because my city does not have a system that is very usable
@8NW2GMYConservative4yrs4Y
No, it should be up to the provincial government
@8KM3KK6Conservative4yrs4Y
Public Transportation should be as efficient as possible while also being free to the greater public
@8G4D2W5Conservative5yrs5Y
No, and current spending should be diverted to energy and environmentally friendly solutions.
@9C3WD8BConservative2yrs2Y
Increase security and give passes to low income families with facial I'd to protect stealing passes.
@8QRNKHZConservative4yrs4Y
Hell no, this is another stupid question
@8GK2PZ5Conservative5yrs5Y
In places that would benefit.
@8DMQCCPConservative5yrs5Y
I believe it is dependent on the city and how sustainable the solutions are
@9C7VHL9Conservative2yrs2Y
Yes, especially for the school buses, as currently, they have hardly changed for decades and I think they should be more comfortable. (Rural)
@99F8TDHConservative2yrs2Y
Yes, and provide more free public transportation, and prioritize the safety and security of paying passengers.
@98ZSBHNConservative2yrs2Y
Only in densely populated areas where data has shown a lack of sufficient public transit
@97T4JZCConservative2yrs2Y
Yes, but handled through provincial or local governments, and spending for environmentally friendly solutions
@928JSGK3yrs3Y
No, public transportation should be free
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
Yes, it will help those who are low-income to get around
@7C3ZZ8M3yrs3Y
Yes, but only by reallocating funds from other government expenses, whether that would be from military, medicare, social security, etc, but not in an excessive amount to where it dramatically impacts those categories.
@8CV6FZ55yrs5Y
we should have public funding for all infastructures.
@8FCYBSY5yrs5Y
If only people start to take care of what is given to them to help them.
@kaparker4yrs4Y
Yes, but only to low income areas or particularly in need of public transportation
@8PH55464yrs4Y
It should be regulated county by county.
@8H72GPZ5yrs5Y
Public transportation funding needs to come from the state government because needs are different in each state.
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
Yes, this will help those who are low-income to get around
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.