Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political theme:
Electoral District (2011):
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation
@8PWLPJS4yrs4Y
No. However, it depends upon locations. For heavily populated area, public transportation should be funded. But it doesn't make logic sense for rural area to have expensive public transportation simply because the population won't support such spending.
@8R2RMP34yrs4Y
Regardless, this should be decided at the state and local level.
@8R2RMP34yrs4Y
Yes, and we should privatize more public transportation systems.
@8R2RMP34yrs4Y
No, this should be decided at the state and local level.
@92MDVFR3yrs3Y
Where would the funding go to? Many metropolitan areas already have sufficient methods, so increasing subsidies to those cities would deny developing cities the budgets that they would require to address their growing needs. However, if the money would be distributed to cities with growing populations and inadequate systems, then yes, the spending would be warranted.
@937LQYX3yrs3Y
Yes but by utilizing more efficient private company services.
@8R7SQ2V4yrs4Y
Not right now, but once the deficit is reduced then yes.
@63ZXW6N4yrs4Y
Should be decided on state level.
@76WTH563yrs3Y
It should be the states' decision.
@84JHJXZ4yrs4Y
No, keep it at the state level
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
