The CSA Group (formerly the Canadian Standards Association), is a not-for-profit standards organization whose primary activities are producing technical standards that are intended to address the needs of a group of affected adopters. Among the fifty-seven different areas of specialization are climate change, business management and safety and performance standards, including those for electrical and electronic equipment, industrial equipment, boilers and pressure vessels, compressed gas handling appliances, environmental protection, and construction materials.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 10mos10MO
No, leave the funding at its current rate, unless there is an event of emergency where current funding is not enough to control the situation.
@8VRD2784yrs4Y
Depends on how much fund they need to sustain the technical standards.
@8VHFQYB4yrs4Y
Keep the funding at the same level.
@8TNJXJK4yrs4Y
Keep it up to date with cost
@8QWBJC64yrs4Y
They don’t need additional funding from the Canadian Government, however the companies that apply should pay a percentage to help fund.
@8PJF3QF4yrs4Y
@8NWJ3SPLibertarian4yrs4Y
no change, and make the manufactures legally responsible for their products, to the point of assisting in the cost of lawsuits which would be passed on to the manufacturers. Tax payers should not be responsible for devices that malfunction.
@99MVFWX2yrs2Y
Decrease Protections. Keep funding the Same
@98HL8XH2yrs2Y
Again, case by case scenario. Some probably need an increase, while other areas a decrease.
@9BKQJDB2yrs2Y
funding is good where it is
@97V8LWC2yrs2Y
i do not have an opinon on this qustion
@9BP44CP2yrs2Y
Yes, but the money cannot go toward labour or bonuses.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
