Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionseducation12yrs ago

Should postsecondary education be a provincial or federal responsibility?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political party:

Political theme:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

Reply

 @9FD7WK7from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

They should be able to pick their own stance

 @8WJWQTSfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Black people suck

 @8VQCY8Pfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe it should be funded publicly,and that standards should be left to the province

 @8VHQVYMfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Shouldn't be payed by the public

 @8VHL735from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Adequate funding and keeping political ideology out of funding no matter where it comes from. Fair Federal funding might keep the nitwits from making funding choices

 @8V4C6JNfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

For funding only. Post secondary should stabilize itself without government interference.

 @8TWZJ3Lfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

More money should be allocated to educate our youth. Keep the money in Canada and spend less overseas

 @8TB3T3Hfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

should be supported by both

 @8QQDC3Jfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe anything can be corrupted and most things are, including government and the education system through the government that is corrupted by corporations. So thats tough, i think ideally if we could trust the government to not be corrupt and feeding us propaganda, then it makes sense to have a standardized education system within reason.

 @8QCGYGFfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

It really doesn’t matter to me

 @Matt117589Greenfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Federal, education needs to be equal in all provinces. To allow for a cross-flow of skilled workers

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies