Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

25 Replies

 @9F5KMPVfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

No, this is a severe violation of privacy. Emails, messages and phone calls should be private. Privacy is a fundamental right and it is not the government's business what Canadians are talking about on call, email or messages. National security is an excuse the government shouldn't be allowed to monitor it's citizens regardless.

 @948L3W4New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

No, except under extreme circumstances & permission from the Attorney General.

 @8Y85WN9from Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Grey area. If it is relevant to court proceedings, then tentatively yes.

 @8VF8YNLfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

No, Not without testamony it will prove a serious crime, Sexual Assault

 @8VDCCCBfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

In obvious circumstances of national security, or where criminal organizations are concerned I support this. In situations involving petty criminals or the general law-abiding public I do not support this.

 @8TD3S5Vfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TBKBH4from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T87PBZfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SRCS7Jfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only to combat terrorism and for those with criminal backgrounds.

 @8RWBJNQfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only if approved by a group of randomly selected lawyers, civil right advocates, and other people.

 @8QS3Z3Bfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but only if the person is involved in a criminal case and by court order

 @8QBY2Q5from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PZND2Gfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

yes but only in extreme circumstances. the government should not be allowed to survey private citizens conversations and interactions

 @8DYSL8Hfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8C4S2BFfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes but it should have to be approved by a commission made up by MPs senators, judicatory officials, executive branch offices, and representatives of the ideas of small government, human rights, open government, and civil rights groups.

 @98TLB6Mfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9C8YBHHfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only during times when there is reason to suspect a threat to public safety (ex. terrorism, war), and even then only if there is reason to suspect someone

 @8TWTTZVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @98WW25PNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @3BBWFYNfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I'm torn...I am concerned with the federal government having cart blanche access to private information, yet I am for being able to prevent acts that negatively harm groups of innocent people.

 @3BC5V7Kfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I find this to be a ridiculous notion. Under certain circumstances it would be permissible but its a blatant intrusion of privacy and completely unnecessary. A acceptable situation is someone suspected for crimes, but just monitoring people for the sake of doing so is completely illogical.

 @3BD78GZConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

if this was an ironclad method to reduce terrorism, then yes. otherwise, this is an invasion of privacy

 @3BCM9WCfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

I feel like the federal government should be allowed to monitor emails and phone calls that are flagged with key words that insinuate a possible terrorist or illegal act.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...