Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@9HHTQD6Conservative1yr1Y
No, the government should enact systems that don't drive people crazy. Look at the political "show" in Ottawa. Those are meant to be adults leading our country. They act like angry children. That's crazy.
@8CDFDG9Conservative5yrs5Y
no, we should focus our money more on newer sicknesses instead of focusing on past mental health which we seem to have figured out very well, i believe we should focus on cancers and major sicknesses instead of mental health
@9LXDZSK2mos2MO
No. The government isn't going to solve your mental health issues. It's an endless money pit that only results in a waste of tax dollars.
@97T4JZCConservative2yrs2Y
yes, if we can afford it, and incentivize private companies to address the issue and lower cost
@michaelconnely3yrs3Y
Our medical establishment is corrupt and needs completely redesigned.
@IINXMP4yrs4Y
No, but we should entirely cut taxes on companies that provide healthcare, garbage disposal, education, and emergency services.
@8P4J7994yrs4Y
Only if they also decrease funding for something else
@8WRGD393yrs3Y
@4VXDGTF4yrs4Y
Yes, it is constitutional to support the arts and sciences in various ways, especially when it benefits the well-being of citizens.
@8RSTXFT4yrs4Y
No, but people should be made more aware of the issues surrounding mental health.
@7MDHCLH4yrs4Y
Government should just stay out of mental health.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.