Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Voting for candidate:

218 Replies

 @B43N69Xfrom Saskatchewan  answered…1mo1MO

After a set amount of money is made per individual human(not business) example of $300,000 should be taxed at 90%. No one needs that much money in a year.

 @B3VGX9Mfrom Saskatchewan  answered…1mo1MO

No, the rich made that money themselves and they already pay taxes so it's fine. They do what they want with the things they make through their sweat and blood. It would be nice if they shared some if they wanted too tho.

 @B4SCCHBfrom Saskatchewan  answered…7 days7D

What’s considered rich? 38% income tax means my raises over 35 years of hard work, feeding the world and loyalty are for someone else. Ridiculous

 @9V5X36N from Saskatchewan  answered…7mos7MO

Corporate taxes should be raised rather than putting higher tax on individuals who are working hard for their money, whether they be high or low income. Massive corporations shouldn't be receiving as many tax breaks as they do, and should have to be more accountable for the large amount of environmental degradation that they're responsible for.

 @9RVGGSKConservativefrom Saskatchewan  answered…9mos9MO

The government should implement a tax system which rewards hard work. But also make sure that the government has enough money to operate. Also the government should have a fairer tax system that makes people who are in the top 1% of income brackets who pay no taxes, pay their fair share.

 @945L3BVfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Lower taxes for lower tax brackets, tax the rich, and remove all tax loopholes for large corporations.

 @93F7X2Gfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Z8MWGFfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Income tax rate is fine but remove the existing loopholes for the rich getting richer

 @8Z6P9KQfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, to a reasonable degree. Rich people aren’t some enemy to target, and shouldn’t be treated like one.

Perhaps a new “rich” tax should be implemented and voted upon by both the rich/poor, to best decide how to utilize those new funds (subsidized housing, groceries, necessities, etc.)

 @8Z4R79Xfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Raise tax on extreme rich, keep tax rate for Rich middle class and lower class

 @8YXSH9Pfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Increase for the rich, decrease for the working middle class and no taxes for the poor (below $30 000/yr) lower income tax rate, remove all existing tax loopholes for all corporations

 @8Y3QR3Bfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8X79SKNfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

No because we are all equal and just because they have more money to give dosent mean they should spend it on taxes if you want you can make sure they all support at least one charity maybe two. But if you want you can lower the tax to the poor because then they have more money to take care of themselfs/family

 @8X6K5JVfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VRZPJVNew Democraticfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and greatly increase the budget for the CRA to go after tax dodgers.

 @8VMPLDCfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase corporate taxation, lower individual taxes (under 200k annual income)

 @8VGR93Vfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Keep tax rate for rich the same, but eliminate loop holes for ultra rich to avoid taxes. Also impliment a "departing tax" for those who want to move their businesses out of the country for tax reasons

 @8VFPDPMfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Taxation is theft. The Government should find it's own way to recieve income.

 @8V4XTGVfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TV6W8Qfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SXWSX4from Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8S3LNCZfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

No the rich already pay high taxes on the high end products they buy. They should just close loophole that keep them from hiding their income.

 @8RPMRSSfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the rich has to be defined more clearly. I would determine rich to be a median household income on $250,000 a year or greater

 @8QWSJQ8from Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PCS6PKfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but lower taxes for the poor, lower the income tax, and remove existing tax loopholes for large corporations

 @8JZX9FWLiberalfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5yrs5Y

Only on the richest. As in over 1million a year or something like that.

 @8HW4LNLfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8D3Z2WPfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9BLGW4Mfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

I think no because they worked there hold life gaining that money making sure there education is good.

 @97DGXH8from Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8Y2WVZVfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and remove the loopholes that allow them to avoid paying full tax.

 @8K5QB2Bfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @95WSYH7from Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

Really rich people don’t pay income tax. So it’s a little pointless. Corporate loopholes need to be assessed, and a method to tax the super rich should be assessed, perhaps a capital tax over a certain limit.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...