Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomyStarted 12yrs agoActive 23hrs ago

Should the government raise taxes on the rich?

Should Canada raise taxes on the rich?

Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political party:

Political theme:

Voting for candidate:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

218 Replies

 @93B2QM6from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

no taxxes return to monke

 @92XVQ73Greenfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and should increase every year

 @8VCSXRLfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only on the ultra rich (above 100 million per annum) and corporate tax

 @8VBQZYDfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Raise taxes on the rich, but lower them for low income people.

 @8V55H4Kfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase taxes on the rich and lower taxes on the poor

 @8TKVYXSCommunistfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and introduce a cap on the total wealth and assets a person or organization can own

 @8T64KVGGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and increase by 25 percent

 @8PCJP27from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Base tax on income.

 @97QYQ2VCommunistfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and we should seize their assets and redistribute it amongst the people who work for them.

 @8ZJNVP5from Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

establish a maximin wage

 @8S2LJ24 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Abolish the income tax, have a land value tax instead

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, to reduce wealth inequality, a progressive tax system should be utilized whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income earners

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, high income earners should pay a higher percentage of tax than lower income earners, and all existing tax loopholes for large corporations should be removed

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, high income earners should pay a higher percentage of tax and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, to reduce wealth inequality, utilize a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax as opposed to those in lower income earning brackets

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, to reduce wealth inequality, a progressive tax system should be utilized whereby high income earners are paying a higher percentage of tax than those in lower income brackets

 @Plutonix from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and add a progressive tax

  @DrEagleTalon from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and remove all existing tax loopholes, deductions, or anything else that allows legal tax evasion.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Axis of Desperation: Russia Recruits North Korean Soldiers in Ukraine War

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III confirmed on Wednesday that North Korea had sent troops to Russia to join the fight against Ukraine, a major shift in Moscow’s effort to win the war. Mr. Austin called the North’s presence a “very, very serious” escalation that would have ramifications in both Europe and Asia.“What exactly are they doing?” Mr. Austin told reporters at a military base in Italy after a trip to Ukraine. “Left to be seen.” He gave no details about the number of troops already there or the number expected to arrive.Mr. Austin cast President Vladimir V. Putin’s need for North Korean mercenaries as a sign of desperation.“This is an indication that he may be in even more trouble than most people realize,” he said. “He went tin-cupping early on to get additional weapons and materials from the D.P.R.K.,’’ he said, using the abbreviation for Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, “and then from Iran, and now he’s making a move to get more people.”But he said intelligence analysts were still trying to discern whether the troops were moving toward Ukraine.Ukrainian officials insist they are headed there, and Ukraine’s defense minister was quoted on Wednesday saying he expected to see North Korean troops in Kursk, the Russian territory that Ukraine has occupied, in the coming days.Mr. Austin’s statement came as American intelligence officials said they were preparing to release a trove of intelligence, including satellite photographs, that show troop ships moving from North Korea to training areas in Vladivostok on Russia’s east coast and other Russian territory further to the north.For two weeks, there have been reports of the movements, fueled by the Ukrainian and South Korean governments, that more than 12,000 North Koreans were training to fight alongside Russian soldiers.American officials have said they estimate that 2,500 North Korean troops have been dispatched. But they made no estimate of how many more might follow, or even how well they might perform on territory that the North’s conscripts have never fought in, amid fellow fighters who speak a different language.

▲  1410 replies

Active 1wk ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1127 replies