Canadian officers say women warriors proved as effective as men in front-line combat roles in Ottawa's most recent big military engagement, in Afghanistan from 2002 to 2011. But Canada has struggled to fill combat jobs with women, and those who do join can feel isolated as a result. And like Cpl. Moman, many of the women who volunteered for these jobs got the impression that their senior officers used them only sparingly in combat. Proponents argue that it will help the military retain more women, who tend to leave the services permanently when they have children. Opponents argue that allowing women to serve in these roles would limit the military's ability to fight in combat situations.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Ideology:
Political party:
Province/Territory:
@44NDCMP4yrs4Y
Not if they are mothers and have small children at home, it is in my believe that a child needs his or her mother to raise them. They actually need both but most importantly the mother for nurturing them.
@9YK7T9B5mos5MO
Not allowing women to serve is discrimination, but the military right now is rife with sexual violence and that is a more pressing concern
@9F5KMPV2yrs2Y
A person of any gender should be allowed to join the military if they want. Not hiring based on gender is discrimination.
@95BRPDN3yrs3Y
There should be more effort put into ensuring there are fewer combat rolls. This being said, women should be allowed to serve in combat rolls. Increased prevention of sexual assault should be put in place.
@9C63S732yrs2Y
I do not care what they do. their life not mine.
@8VH22SV4yrs4Y
Women and children should be protected.
@8V23N8YNew Democratic4yrs4Y
I don't agree with military in general.
@8QT9385Conservative4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as they can do the job as they should
@8QSJWV74yrs4Y
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men but there should be programs in place that will protect them from sexual assault.
No I believe we shouldn’t even have the military.
@8NHT9HF4yrs4Y
Yes, if they choose to and have the training to do so, also put programs in place protect them from sexual assault from their coworkers
@8D8S5H25yrs5Y
As long as they can capably complete the missions and they agree to the risks
@93P92RN3yrs3Y
We don’t need an armed forces
@936KWVL3yrs3Y
In non-spec ops roles, sure
@8VJNWNB4yrs4Y
No, a nation should not risk women's lives in combat
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.