Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Polling Division:
@92XLW6X3yrs3Y
Ban all muslims from entering the countryside outright and permanently
@8WLCHMM4yrs4Y
No, but immigrants with criminal backgrounds should be banned
@8VVGNJ24yrs4Y
I think that we have to be carful of the terrorists but also help protect those that are innocent however, keeping the country safe.
@8THTW67Conservative4yrs4Y
This is extremely crazy question to ask and very steryeotypical
@8T3KYYV4yrs4Y
They should not be banned but held in security measured places intill proven not
Yes however depends on where they came from.
@8M8923Z4yrs4Y
No, but each immigrant regardless of religion should be screened
@9CHQDDB2yrs2Y
No, but we should have a stricter process for screening all immigrants.
@99K5B5M2yrs2Y
No, but any new immigrant (not specifically Muslim) should be
@939NMG83yrs3Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.