Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Polling Division:
@9FS34DY2yrs2Y
There should be objective screening to determine high risk views including harbouring hate for ethnic groups like Jews
@9FM9QN92yrs2Y
No, as long as they possess no harm.
@8W5XGMN4yrs4Y
They should just be more careful and picky
@8VR79G34yrs4Y
No, but we should be extra cautious, but not allowing them in at all isn't good because they could be fleeing a country.
@8VR78WN4yrs4Y
No, We should allow people who are fleeing from a war, third world country into canada
@8VCYD3JConservative4yrs4Y
No, but each individual should be properly screened.
@8PP87TJ4yrs4Y
No, but careful selections process should be in place.
@8PCKWJY4yrs4Y
No, but make sure they are safe as possible to enter the country
@8LR48TG4yrs4Y
@8JDJJLT5yrs5Y
This question should read: should immigrants... No need to specify Muslim
@8J4W6MQ5yrs5Y
No, but the government does need to improve it's screening process
@98M38972yrs2Y
Don’t ban them put them on probation
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.