Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Polling Division:
@9FTH64S2yrs2Y
Ban all immigration and kick out the vast amount of illegals and students staying here without being enrolled
@93Z5J763yrs3Y
Improve screening and lengthen the time for acceptance into Canada based on the amount of time it may take to screen the person. Warn people of the amount of time it may take by case to case basis.
@92XLW6X3yrs3Y
Ban all muslims from entering the countryside outright and permanently
@8Y86K773yrs3Y
A very thorough background check should happen.
@8VW99PP4yrs4Y
Govt should improve ability to screen out potential terrorists both foreign and domestic. Not single out one people based on race, religious or country of origin.
@8VVHXMCConservative4yrs4Y
The screening process should be more stringent for ALL immigrants.
@8VJ4TBZ4yrs4Y
I believe they should be allowed to come here if screening deems them safe however giving them money and homes should not be a part of the deal. We should be helping our own first as we have high homeless numbers and our seniors and veterans are being ignored in my opinion.
@8VGZ9YFConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, but only from hotspot countries known for high levels of terrorist activity
@8V5DLDV4yrs4Y
No, but we should screen immigrants more and accept only skilled workers.
@8V4M9G44yrs4Y
People who are terrorists should not be allowed in, and our officials should stop praising terrorists
@8THNVF74yrs4Y
Don’t let them in at all. They should stay in there own country and make it better
@8SDPH6Y4yrs4Y
@8RZMHMP4yrs4Y
Ban all immigrants and improve birth rate.
@8RN3Y8N4yrs4Y
No more muslims or non christen immigration.
@8R39K474yrs4Y
No, Banning immigrants off of their religion is unconstitutional, but have a background and criminal background check.
@8NW2NF54yrs4Y
ALL immigrants should be highly scrutinized for the purpose of reliability in ACCEPTING Canadian Values, and our LAWS. Just as I had to.
@998HHHF2yrs2Y
Every individual has to be accesses to comply to Canadian rules as per our civil rights constitution
@8VVS9FC4yrs4Y
Immigration from high risk countries should be much stricter and have certain conditions for at least 25 years
@8JW33M84yrs4Y
Stop blaming one race, us First Nations were here way before you. Stop letting everyone IN. You could leave to make there be less population.
@96JQJPS3yrs3Y
There should only be Anglo-Aryan, Germanic, Celtic, and Scandinavian immigration and all non-Aryan populations should be kicked out by force.
@8NX8F2X4yrs4Y
In certain circumstances we can let them in but they must be monitored or in confinement until it’s proven they are safe and will adhere to our laws
@3YNTGFH4yrs4Y
No - We should completely reform our LEGAL immigration process, improving our security measures, increasing the efficiency, decreasing the cost for LEGAL immigrants, and increasing the number of immigrants.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
