Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Polling Division:
@9FTH64S2yrs2Y
Ban all immigration and kick out the vast amount of illegals and students staying here without being enrolled
@9FB77922yrs2Y
No but all immigrants should have their vetting GREATLY increased.
@93Z5J763yrs3Y
Improve screening and lengthen the time for acceptance into Canada based on the amount of time it may take to screen the person. Warn people of the amount of time it may take by case to case basis.
@92XLW6X3yrs3Y
Ban all muslims from entering the countryside outright and permanently
@8SDPH6Y4yrs4Y
@8RZMHMP4yrs4Y
Ban all immigrants and improve birth rate.
@8RN3Y8N4yrs4Y
No more muslims or non christen immigration.
@8F3GDXM5yrs5Y
No but immigrants from high risk countries should be more thoroughly evaluated
@8VVS9FC4yrs4Y
Immigration from high risk countries should be much stricter and have certain conditions for at least 25 years
@9BBJRD82yrs2Y
There should simply be intense background checks for any immigrants.
@96JQJPS3yrs3Y
There should only be Anglo-Aryan, Germanic, Celtic, and Scandinavian immigration and all non-Aryan populations should be kicked out by force.
@8NX8F2X4yrs4Y
In certain circumstances we can let them in but they must be monitored or in confinement until it’s proven they are safe and will adhere to our laws
@8VC7WDN4yrs4Y
Yes, during a 10 to 15 year immigration moritorium, reforms to our screening process should be made, especially toward muslim immigrants. We should not welcome those who import their culture into ours and drastically change the face of America. Assimilation should be mandatory for these kind of immigrants.
@6HDD83R4yrs4Y
Muslims who are not liberal*, secular, heterosexual or asexual, centrist or rightist, religiously tolerant, and monogamist should not be allowed to enter the U.S.
* liberal (liberal Muslims as in Muslims who are more open minded about their sons & daughters marrying non-Muslims (e.g. Christians) or even converting to Christianity upon their marriage to their non-Muslim spouse (e.g. the first lady of Argentina who converted to Roman Catholicism from Islam, where she stated in an interview with La Nación newspaper in 2012, that her father is a liberal Muslim who did not object to one of Juliana's sisters marrying a Christian and the other a Jew), secular, pro-gender equality, pro-democracy, pro-Israel, pro-west/westernized and religiously tolerant
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
