Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Polling Division:
@8VWS4YG4yrs4Y
No, but we should prioritize families/people who do not have any previous offenses and who have not broken any Candian or national laws
@8VL3PVQ4yrs4Y
No, there should be a thorough screening process regardless of religion
@8VHSR5K4yrs4Y
Yes, until we take care of our own Canadian poverty and unemployment issues first
@8VCH7S74yrs4Y
no but get a better screening process
@8VCH3NF4yrs4Y
The screening should just be improved.
Government should do proper background checks
@8V4M9G44yrs4Y
People who are terrorists should not be allowed in, and our officials should stop praising terrorists
@8RCMXHK4yrs4Y
no, they shouldn't be just ban them that's not fair to the others there just trying to live.
@8JCR2BN5yrs5Y
This type of racial profiling is not acceptable.
@96FS33J3yrs3Y
No but Muslim immigrants should have more thorough background checks
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.