Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Polling Division:
@8FMV7LVConservative5yrs5Y
We do need to be careful of who we let in, but we cannot discriminate the whole religion because of a few people
@9FMNJ5M2yrs2Y
If they come to the country eligaliy then yes they should.
@9CMKSDZ2yrs2Y
Most terriost attacks are because of oppression, I dont believe that a whole comunity should be turned away due to countries reputations or groups. Canada should increase screening to protect all citizens.
@92BYQ5F3yrs3Y
All immigrants should have strict screening process before being allowed into country
@8WX95P73yrs3Y
yes, but first there should be a background/criminal check before they are aloud to enter
@8TJ5VQW4yrs4Y
ALL immigrants should be properly screened and verified. Terrorists are not just Muslim, Improve the screening for all and ensure the rues are enforced
@8TJ3Y4Z4yrs4Y
No, But ban people of high risk of becoming a terrorist
@8LR333N4yrs4Y
No, They need a lot of screening if they come from high-risk countries. They also have to be beneficial to society and well integrating into Canadian society.
Only if there is believed to be links to terrorism and valid proof.
@9CP5TWB2yrs2Y
Yes, Unless they are refugees
no, but security measures should be higher volume
@9CMHNZS2yrs2Y
Keep them on probation until we can screen out the posibilty of them being dangerous
@98F7NBY2yrs2Y
no, but the government should still screen everyone very well
@8V55RX54yrs4Y
No, but tougher screening process from “higher risk” countries.
@8SLWDF94yrs4Y
no, but showed fill a need the county can use and for high risk people thoroughly investigated
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
