Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcareStarted 9yrs agoActive 12mins ago

Should there be more or less privatization of hospital and healthcare services?

Privatization is the process of transferring governmental control and ownership of a service or industry to a privately owned business.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political party:

Political theme:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Healthcare Privatization

@CANwedoit
#1 Informed Voter
Test Your Knowledge

312 Replies

 @B46LSRCfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3wks3W

there should be no privatization for hospitals as canada is a free health care system, but should be privatized for dentistry, etc. as it is not paid by the government

 @B2KRJ74from Saskatchewan  answered…3mos3MO

Hybrid system, to offer options to those who can afford it, while freeing up space in hospitals that are not privatized who cannot afford privatized

 @9DSL8GKfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

If the system was properly funded from the mass amount of taxes we already pay and less bureaucrats and dysfunctional management sopping up all the funding id say we wouldn't have such a problem. The people doing the hard work aren't being paid properly and the fat cats with a useless management degree and zero field experience need to go.

 @8GN4VMFfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5yrs5Y

yes i like how it is but if someone really needs something they should try and make a way for them to getting it

 @9BLJ2Y4from Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

You should chose for your self individual

 @8Z6P9KQfrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

I’m currently satisfied with the current system, though I wouldn’t mind a hybridized or split system (one privatized, one publicly funded to see what works, what doesn’t.)

 @8WQV464Conservativefrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

only if people got got covid 19 for antae vaccinating(less)

 @8VRJ6C9from Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Really dig to where the money is going and abuse of funds.

 @8V45QWTfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Allow privatization with the government purchasing these services, like France

 @8R7R6TQfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Should be options for both

 @8GN4MSCNew Democraticfrom Saskatchewan  answered…5yrs5Y

Less wealthy citizens should be charged for services if they can afford it. People unable to fund themselves should be payed for.

 @8V6HDV5Conservativefrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

More, and less government regulation

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Rashida Tlaib calls On Blinken to Resign Over Gaza war

A US congresswoman urged Secretary of State Antony Blinken to resign for not changing the policy on arms supply to Israel."Secretary Blinken exposed his lie by announcing that there will be no change to any policy, despite admitting that the Israeli government has still failed to comply with all of their demands."Secretary Blinken has continued to lie to Congress and should resign," Rashida Tlaib said on the floor of the House of Representatives.Her remarks came after the State Department said Tuesday that the US would not change its policy on arms transfers to Israel even though the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip remains dire.A deadline was set by Washington in an Oct. 13 letter for Israel to ramp up access to aid within 30 days in the besieged Palestinian enclave or risk US military aid.Tlaib said the Biden administration continues to ignore reports that Israel is blocking humanitarian aid into Gaza in violation of US and international law."The Israeli government is using starvation as a weapon of war," she said, showing a picture of a starving child."US law is very clear: No nation blocking US humanitarian assistance can receive US weapons. The Biden administration cannot pick and choose when they comply with our own laws."Children are forced to eat pet food and bug-infested flour, look at this and do not turn your back on again, being complicit to this war crime, but Blinken says there's no need to change our own policy. Shameful!" she added.Eight humanitarian aid organizations said in a statement that Israel has failed to meet the criteria set out by the US to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza.Israel has continued its devastating offensive against Gaza since a cross-border attack by the Palestinian resistance group, Hamas, on Oct. 7, 2023. The onslaught has killed more than 43,700 people and rendered the enclave almost uninhabitable.Israel faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its deadly war on Gaza.

▲  56 replies