+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 219 Sault Ste. Marie voters.

9%
Yes
91%
No
9%
Yes
91%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 219 Sault Ste. Marie voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 219 Sault Ste. Marie voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Sault Ste. Marie voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B4M88F9from Ontario  answered…1wk1W

It should vary on both the driver's income and the amount of previous violations in a set time period.

 @B4KSLVQfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

Yes, for less serious crimes. Impaired driving and other concious, dangerous decisions should be heavily penalized.

 @B4KKMLRfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

No, but the reason for violations should be kept in mind while charging the driver

 @B4GC5JJfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

 @B4FMRS5from Quebec  answered…2wks2W

Somewhat, not more than a 25% difference between a rich person and a poor one

 @B4FM9XBfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

 @B4FHCQQfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Penalty for traffic violations should be staggered to the severity of the violation and if they are repeat violators.

 @B4FDT5F from British Columbia  answered…2wks2W

No, you can't excuse someone over breaking the law with how broke or rich they are, don't do the crime if you don't have the time.