+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 383 New Democratic voters.

30%
Yes
70%
No
26%
Yes
63%
No
3%
Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency
5%
No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens
1%
Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities
2%
No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it
0%
No, this would be too expensive to implement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 383 New Democratic voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 383 New Democratic voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from New Democratic voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RKDWR4from Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Only technology that specifically, and only recognizes the faces of wanted criminals, suspected terrorists etc, not technology that recognizes the face of every citizen.

 @9RFSJMHfrom New Brunswick  answered…4mos4MO

 @9RCQVYVfrom New Brunswick  answered…4mos4MO

 @9RBXNLDfrom Quebec  answered…4mos4MO

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

I think they should use the technology but they shouldn't have mass surveillance on everyone all the time

 @9QTMDJTfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

No, not until facial recognition is more constant and doesn't mess up/miss-ID people.

 @9QQG9Z8from Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

 @9P8NRFM from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but this should not be the only method of identification. For example, in order to participate in Canadian elections the voter must present at least two different forms of identification that contain the individual's name, date of birth, address, etc.