Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 197 British Columbia voters.
80% Yes |
20% No |
80% Yes |
20% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 197 British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 197 British Columbia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from British Columbia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9TW2CCS2mos2MO
No, but tax breaks should be awarded for those that do
@9TFQXBL2mos2MO
New housing development should focus on using existing resources and infrastructure to create accessible housing.
@9RS542R4mos4MO
Yes, but we need to start going away from car centric
@9RLR8YH4mos4MO
Not if it comes at the expense of solving the housing crisis
@9RC25L94mos4MO
Depends on if there is a lack of such things already or this would cause there to be a lack thereof.
@9RC2QHK4mos4MO
Yes, and be planned with accessibility to transit and public services (schools, groceries, utilities) in mind.
@9RBY87R4mos4MO
Eventually, but the primary concern should be the construction of habitats
@9RBVDVT4mos4MO
No, funds for parks and greenspaces should be captured in development fees paid to provinces and municipalities.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
