+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 200 Fiscal Conservatism voters.

92%
Yes
7%
No
92%
Yes
7%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 200 Fiscal Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 200 Fiscal Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Fiscal Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TVPNXWfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

they should set a limit on the amount of land or properties a foreign investor can own

 @B4RSNRNfrom Washington  answered…4 days4D

We need foreign investment, perhaps this needs to be tightly monitored for a couple years but in the long term no.

 @B4PPBZNfrom Ontario  answered…6 days6D

Restrict, or at least be heavily examined for money laundering, and be heavily taxed if not occupied.

 @B4MZCRFfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

yes and investigate the multiple home owners, including investigations to any potential slumlords (this should apply to any multiple home owners).

 @B4LW25Gfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

I have two opinion's. 1. My boyfriend is a pipe layer. he tells two things 1. The foreign investors are good but they dont understand the dynamics and budget and make everything cheaper, materials and just cut costs of quality for quantity. and then they jack the rent. theyll take over places in bad condition renovate a few things then, they jack rent and extra 400-800 dollers a month. and its leading to the vancouver and Toronto like prices. on the other side of things its good because it brings money and work. creates homes.

 @9RXWPMMfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

 @9RGCB9Pfrom Alberta  answered…9mos9MO

 @9RD5G37from Manitoba  answered…9mos9MO