Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 153 Independents voters.
93% Yes |
7% No |
93% Yes |
7% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 153 Independents voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 153 Independents voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Independents voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9TVPNXW6mos6MO
they should set a limit on the amount of land or properties a foreign investor can own
@B3K9X786 days6D
In this case, if it is done through creating problems and using illegal methods, then the government should restrict it based on the situation because it would harm the economy but there should also be monitoring by a single operation because too many hands on a single problem would cause a problem to spiral without fixing any issues.
@B2ZSZNS3wks3W
No, but add a significant "foreign buyers tax" to the purcahse price and a significant "vacancy tax" if the property remains vacant,
@B29ZVFC2mos2MO
If the domestic people have problem with purchasing a house, I think it's necessary for government to restrict it.
@9WYDMSD4mos4MO
Yes, no foreigner should be allowed to own property nevermind foreign investors who are causing our housing crisis with their speculation.
@9WK3LGV5mos5MO
This is not a yes or no situation, as some foreign investment is necessary it should be regulated.
@9VCJXCY5mos5MO
Yes, but buy a vacancy tax, if they want to leave it empty they can pay
@9TTDYHC6mos6MO
Quit focusing on foreign buyers and focus on corporate investments
Join in on the most popular conversations.