+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 307 British Columbia voters.

53%
Yes
47%
No
53%
Yes
47%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 307 British Columbia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 307 British Columbia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from British Columbia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZVR74Sfrom Quebec  answered…5 days5D

Mortgage rates should be lower and locked in longer. No bank should give a mortgage for a house you can't afford

 @9ZTXY87from Ontario  answered…6 days6D

Yes, because they will be homeless otherwise. Giving them money might be useless—but if that were an option, the government should instead tell them to buy a cheaper home and support them in that endeavour.

 @9ZMSWNZfrom Colorado  answered…2wks2W

 @9ZHZL24from Ontario  answered…3wks3W

I think it should depend on the circumstances and past financial history and current circumstances.

 @9Z9ZCV7from Alberta  answered…4wks4W

I think it depends on why they are facing a foreclosure. If it is because they choose to live outside of their means then they should not receive assistance. If they are facing foreclosure because of job loss and are actively making an effort to help themselves then they should receive assistance.

 @9YKBYMXfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Yes, only under specific circumstances and be strictly regulated to prevent irresponsible borrowing

 @9YK7T9Bfrom Alberta  answered…4wks4W

Yes, but there should be regulations on who can receive this assistance, for what reasons, and how many times.

 @9WK3LGVfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

there should be some sort of assistance that one would apply for. I feel that some small assistance may help a family in a tight situation and get them back on track without a total loss.