+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 221 Federalism voters.

38%
Yes
62%
No
38%
Yes
62%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 221 Federalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 221 Federalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Federalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B43P7NPfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Completely dependent on the circumstances. For example, a person who has lost their job through no fault of their own should absolutely get help. But someone who is over leveraged and spending on things they cannot afford - no.

 @B4VD8NVfrom Ontario  answered…4hrs4H

Yes but there should be a review of their finances to ensure the program is not abused by irresponsible borrowers.

 @B4TXJ28 answered…14hrs14H

Yes but only if they are not multiple time offenders and are not constantly making bad financial decisions

 @B4RFJ3Kfrom Alberta  answered…5 days5D

Yes, but only if that person still has a job, family, and has a valid reason why they can't keep the payments up, and or it isn't nessicerily their fault for foreclosure.

 @B4PPBZNfrom Ontario  answered…7 days7D

No, but there should be an avenue for homeowners to be forgiven loans by the bank once the homeowner has paid enough to the bank to cover the amount initially loaned.

 @B35DJCPfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only on primary residences and not for any investment properties which have fueled real estate speculation

 @B34JYJPfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Government should have programs available for people to access depending on circumstances of foreclosures

 @B32CD5Rfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

CMHC should protect the home owner and not the bank. Since it is the home owner who pays the premium