Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 512 Right voters.
81% Yes |
19% No |
74% Yes |
16% No |
5% Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
2% No, I would prefer term limits instead |
2% Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office |
1% No, our government needs experienced leaders |
0% No, this discriminates against older politicians |
|
0% No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 512 Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 512 Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9XMKKT43wks3W
No, only if there exists substantial evidence to prove their potential senility should they be obliged to take a mental competency test
@9JWWFBK9mos9MO
Mandatory retirement should be initiated at 75, along with Term Limits for all elected roles, and the senate should be banned or elected.
@9FMDLYL1yr1Y
Nobody above age 70 should be able to run
@9FF5G761yr1Y
Just cap the age at 70 instead
@9D3WWDS1yr1Y
No, there should be an age limit of 70 for running for public office.
@9CYGHXW1yr1Y
Only if there is enough evidence to suggest the test is necessary.
@9CQ8CWT1yr1Y
No, but require psychiatric evaluation every 2 years for politicians aged 80 years or older
@9D36K4Q1yr1Y
It depends. There's a legitimate argument to be made, as older people have more health issues which could impede decisions, but younger people also have that to some ability, so I would say we should be more cautious.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
