@ISIDEWITHQuestionsSocial IssuesStarted 4yrs agoActive 2 days ago

Should people under the age of 18 years old be able to receive gender-transition treatments?

In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone under the age of 18. Opponents of the bill argue that it is an assault on transgender rights and that transition treatments are a private matter that should be decided between parents, their children and doctors. Supporters of the bill argue that children are too young to make the decision to receive gender transition treatment and only adults over the age of 18 should be allowed to do so.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Communist

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 868 Communist voters.

83%
Yes
17%
No
59%
Yes
14%
No
13%
Yes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy
3%
No, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions
6%
Yes, but only if they are at least 16 years old
0%
No, and ban all gender transitioning treatments
4%
Yes, but with parental permission
0%
Yes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 868 Communist voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 868 Communist voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Communist voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8S4YQ5Cfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, after they are connected to proper supports and resources

 @8SF7HN3from Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the body and brain need to finish developing before hormone treatment can start in order to prevent the increased risk of mental health problems increasing.

 @8S5LPK4from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but I think it should be case by case because every body is different and it depends on the health of the patient.

 @8S4TGRSfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, children need time to decided whether or not they truely believe themself to be the opposite gender of their original sex

 @9FGK522from Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, they are life saving procedures

 @9FM9QN9from British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

No, give them more time to be their real selves and wait until legal age.

 @9G67KN6from British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, with parental permission, at least thought about it for a year or 2 and non-surgical treatments

 @9FVD829from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Children’s under 18 years of age should not get gender transition treatments until they turn 18 or 19!

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Gender Transition” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

South Carolina Bans Gender Transition Care for Minors

South Carolina’s Republican governor, Henry McMaster, signed a bill on Tuesday that bars health professionals from performing gender-transition surgeries, prescribing puberty blocking drugs and overseeing hormone treatments for patients under 18. The state now joins about two dozen others that have passed laws restricting or banning what doctors call gender-affirming care for minors.The law, which goes into effect immediately, also requires principals, teachers and other school staff members to tell parents when their children want to use a name other than their legal one, or pronouns that do not match their sex assigned at birth.South Carolina lawmakers tried to pass similar legislation in 2021 and 2022 but failed to get them through the State House of Representatives. In 2022, the clock ran out on a broader bill banning transition care for minors, but lawmakers put a clause in the state budget that banned a pediatric clinic at a public hospital from using state funds on transition care for people under 16. The clinic soon went further, ending hormonal treatments to anyone under 18.In this election year, House Republicans made gender-transition treatment a priority. The measure, known as House Bill 4624, was passed by the legislature earlier this month. The new legislation not only expands the ban on care for minors to all providers statewide, but also bars adults under 26 from using Medicaid to cover the costs for such care.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Federal Judge blocks California deepfakes law

Federal Judge blocks California deepfakes law A federal judge on Wednesday blocked a California measure restricting the use of digitally altered political “deepfakes” just two weeks after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill into law.The law channels rising alarm about artificial intelligence’s capacity to disrupt elections by sowing misinformation, with voters increasingly confronted with deepfake images and audio impersonating candidates. Musk, who owns X, stoked that debate when he shared the AI-altered video of Harris in July, drawing Newsom’s public promise to prohibit similar practices.The ruling is a blow to a push by the state’s leading Democrats to rein in misleading content on social media ahead of Election Day.Chris Kohls, known as “Mr Reagan” on X, sued to prevent the state from enforcing the law after posting an AI-generated video of a Harris campaign ad on the social media site. He claimed the video was protected by the First Amendment because it was a parody.The new California law — which will take effect before the November election — channels rising alarm about artificial intelligence’s capacity to disrupt elections by sowing misinformation, with voters increasingly confronted with deepfake images and audio impersonating candidates. Musk, who owns X, stoked that debate when he shared the AI-altered video of Harris in July, drawing Newsom’s public promise to prohibit similar practices.

▲  3111 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

GOP looks to avoid disaster in Nebraska Senate race

Republicans are looking to avoid a disaster in the Nebraska Senate race amid signs that an independent candidate could be giving Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) a run for her money.Independent Senate candidate and political newcomer Dan Osborn is challenging Fischer for her seat, betting that Nebraskans are hungry for a nonpartisan senator in a state former President Trump won by close to 20 points in 2020.Despite Nebraska’s reliably red political leanings, the dynamics of the race have shifted in recent weeks: Republican groups have started spending in the race, and the nonpartisan election handicapper Cook Political Report last week shifted the race away from Fischer.“As a pragmatist and a realist, generally in politics, you don’t spend money if you’re not worried or at least interested in making sure that you protect your seat,” said Brent Comstock, a consultant in the Cornhusker State who primarily works with Democrats.“He’s appealing to the average moderate Nebraskan who realizes that one, the political parties are challenging, and two, that people want to elect someone who stands up for their rights and not for a party boss,” he added, while noting the clear Republican registration edge in the state.Osborn, who has leaned into his bio as a steamfitter who led a major strike against Kellogg’s in 2021 in Omaha, has started to pick up traction in the Nebraska Senate race.Outside groups Retire Career Politicians PAC and Nebraska Railroaders for Public Safety have poured money into the race in support of Osborn, including at least $3.2 million from the Retire Career Politicians PAC alone, according to AdImpact. Both groups have received sizable contributions from the liberal-leaning dark money group Sixteen Thirty Fund.

▲  237 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

AOC Sparks Backlash After Ditching Gender Pronouns

Famously progressive Democrat congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised eyebrows by removing her pronouns from her X account. The move from Squad lawmaker, 35, seen as one of the most liberal members of Congress, was seen by some as a sign that the cultural tide is turning following Donald Trump's election win. Journalist Benjamin Ryan said records showed AOC removed her 'she/her' pronouns sometime between August 3, 2023, and May 28, 2024. Critics branded her a hypocrite, and noted that just two years ago AOC apologized to followers for not having pronouns in her Instagram bio, claiming they 'fell off' and she didn't realize. Conservatives were quick to mock AOC after it was realized that she had removed the pronouns from her account bio. Some also noted that she changed her moniker from the genderless 'Representative' to 'Congresswoman' as she removed her pronouns. Ocasio-Cortez has long been a supporter of transgender rights, including so-called gender-affirming care for children, and transgender girls competing in female sports.But the Democrats more extreme stances were blamed as a massive vote loser for Kamala Harris in the recent election.An advert showing her supporting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgeries for illegal migrant prisoners was played on repeat by Team Trump.Many Dems' insistence that opposing hormones for trans children or banning trans girls from joining female sports teams was transphobic further alienated centrists.Immigration and inflation were the issues that ultimately swung the election for Donald Trump, but the Dems' unpopular trans stance has now forced a reckoning within the party.

▲  2117 replies