In October 2019 Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey announced that his social media company would ban all political advertising. He stated that political messages on the platform should reach users through the recommendation of other users – not through paid reach. Proponents argue that social media companies don’t have the tools to stop the spread of false information since their advertising platforms aren’t moderated by human beings. Opponents argue that the ban will disenfranchise candidates and campaigns who rely on social media for grassroots organizing and fundraising.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 1.1k Rhinoceros voters.
58% Yes |
42% No |
58% Yes |
42% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Rhinoceros voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Rhinoceros voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Rhinoceros voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B4RSSZ54 days4D
No, but it should provide a resource to sources to support claims they're making. Higher power higher responsibility.
@B3DCMJ82mos2MO
It should be up to the social media company to decide what advertising it bans. They are private enterprises and should be allowed freedoms.
@9QZGVST9mos9MO
No, but an independent, non-partisan commission should put disclaimers on political advertising if it contains misinformation or statements that are disputed by the widely-accepted facts.
@9P8NRFM 10mos10MO
No, but there should be fines or in some cases laws to combat those who consistently publish or support misinformation.
@9M4LF5F12mos12MO
No, but I believe that some mediation to prevent false information or to have fact checked information would certainly help deal with this sort of problem. Any way for users to have real links to actual sources where they can get real information is important.
@9LKR58Y1yr1Y
Politics is sort of entrenched in everything. Maybe 'blatant political advertising' is a better descriptor but this neglects independently paid for advertisements on large platforms. Either way, this doesn't seem very feesible if not for very high censorship. So no.
@9HKV5MJ1yr1Y
Informational advertising which solely identifies a candidate and their party affiliations should be permitted, but no “attack ads” consisting solely of criticism of a rival candidate.
@9H5ZN2X1yr1Y
No, it is our responsibility to research on proper information and to not let any fake information enter our minds.
Join in on the most popular conversations.